project-loom-c5m VS manifold

It is not. Blocking IO (with some exceptions mentioned in the JEP) will automatically be translated by the runtime into non-blocking IO when it occurs on virtual threads, and no OS threads will be blocked. You can have a million threads blocking on a million sockets (obviously without creating a million OS threads): https://github.com/ebarlas/project-loom-c5m

You can't do that with thread pools. You could achieve that scalability with async code, but then observability tools will not be able to track the IO operations and who initiated them, but with virtual threads you'll see exactly what business operation is doing what IO and why.

That might change in JDK 21 (with virtual threads). See this https://github.com/ebarlas/project-loom-c5m . It achieve 5 million persistent connections (again depends on the server capacity and kernal tuning) using normal simple blocking code (https://github.com/ebarlas/project-loom-c5m/blob/main/src/main/java/loomtest/EchoServer.java) . It's a far better better programming model compared to JS async/await.

Considering the Amount domain types, I like the manifold project’s unit expression[1] approach where the unit and domain type are integrated and always reconciled.

1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/tree/master/man...

> I am glad to see a project that provides a robust and elegant API for building rest services in Java.

Alternatives for _consuming_ REST services is perhaps an equally interesting proposition, particularly since there are potentially potentially many consumers per service e.g., the manifold JSON project[1].

Other areas where Springboot feels overbearing include JPA/ORM support. In my view this is its greatest weakness, but like the "no one ever got fired for buying IBM" cliche, the same can be said today about Springboot.

1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/blob/master/man...