plurid-data-structures-typescript VS asami

Somewhat along these lines, I have formed a concept forcedly called "differentially composable string", or "deposed string", or more precise "poor man's git".

The intended use case is to obtain a compact representation of all the historic text entered into an input field (notes, comments, maybe long-form): all the stages of the text, where a stage is a tuple [add/remove, start_index, text/end_index]. Once you get the stages from the deposed string as JSON, you could transform them however you want then load them into a new deposed string.

You can read more on GitHub: https://github.com/plurid/plurid-data-structures-typescript#... or play around on my note-taking app implementing deposed strings and more: https://denote.plurid.com

Unlike some other commenters, I agree that graph models are usually a better fit for most data than relational models. There's been some interesting work in recent years developing this idea: in the Clojure world there's Datomic, XTDB, and a host of competitors, all of which build on work from Semantic Web/SPARQL/triplestores and logic programming. Some are even intended to be used as primary datastores: they support some amount of schema and constraints, have well-defined consistency and ACID guarantees, etc. This makes them unlike graph databases like Neo4J and others, which fill an architectural role more like Elasticsearch as a read-optimization tool. Here's an interesting talk making a case for triple-based databases.

Despite the documentation that exists, I've heard many people who have been confused about how to query Datomic, Datascript, Asami, or other graph databases. So I've made an attempt at explaining it https://github.com/threatgrid/asami/wiki/Introduction

The first Graph implementation for Asami was a simple in-memory data structure, described in my ClojureD talk. The code for this appears in asami.index. This file started much smaller (as referenced above), but has since expanded with the needs extended functionality, such as transactions, and transitive closure operations.