plurid-data-structures-typescript VS FusionCache

Somewhat along these lines, I have formed a concept forcedly called "differentially composable string", or "deposed string", or more precise "poor man's git".

The intended use case is to obtain a compact representation of all the historic text entered into an input field (notes, comments, maybe long-form): all the stages of the text, where a stage is a tuple [add/remove, start_index, text/end_index]. Once you get the stages from the deposed string as JSON, you could transform them however you want then load them into a new deposed string.

You can read more on GitHub: https://github.com/plurid/plurid-data-structures-typescript#... or play around on my note-taking app implementing deposed strings and more: https://denote.plurid.com

Want an easy to use cache with advanced resiliency features? Look no further than FusionCache. It's built for performance, good refresh rates, better auto-setup, better logs, and more. Congrats to the team on shipping your first major and stable version 🎉 and receiving over 3.8 million downloads.

I wrote an internal nuget package for our team that does similar stuff to your work, although I called mine ICachedRequest. Unlike you I denied myself the enjoyment of exploring a custom caching solution and ended up injecting FusionCache into my mediatr behavior.

The most undervalued library from that list is FusionCache. The rest is either well-known (like FluentAssertions) or pretty specific to the guy's experience (like the WPF stuff).

The instances (using FusionCache for instance) sync over Redis pub/sub.

LazyCache is amazing. Btw I'm using FusionCache and it is good too

If you are in the .NET space I suggest you to take a look at FusionCache. It has cache stampede protection built in, plus some other nice features like a fail-safe mechanism and soft/hard timeouts https://github.com/jodydonetti/ZiggyCreatures.FusionCache