pev2 VS zheap

This runs in about 250ms. Let's have a look at the explain plan to understand it better. To visualise it, I am using the excellent visualisation tool from Dalibo.

The PEV2 is open source and give you a good visualization. I never used this pgmustard to compare.

https://explain.dalibo.com/

Visualize Your Plan: Visit explain.dalibo.com and paste the generated plan text and query. Then, hit Submit. The tool will generate a visualization of your query plan. Here's an example of the visualization for the fifth attempt version of the query from this post. It shows the different types of scans that were used and how the data gets combined. The duration of each operation is also shown:

You can download the whole analyzer as a simple html file and use it this way. No need to obfuscate or sanitize anything at all.

https://github.com/dalibo/pev2

You might be interested in sites like https://explain.dalibo.com/ which make the output a bit nicer to read. I use these quite often to quickly identify bottlenecks.

PostgreSQL Query Plan Analyzer and Visualizer

I didn’t know about pev2, interesting, checking it now. Did you integrate the component yourself or are you using this hosted page by them: https://explain.dalibo.com/?

IMO it‘s important to get started with indexing. Grab your most frequently used queries and run an EXPLAIN ANALYZE to identify the problems. This tool might help you to understand your execution plans. Once you identified your problems, you can build indexes and check again. Then you should regularly check if your indexes are used.

Hoping something like the zheap storage engine initiative should help us get past these bottlenecks in the future. Until then we may not be able to prevent the bloat but could certainly minimize the impact.

Hey, OP here -- it is a bit odd and also possibly immature to be so harsh on MySQL apropos of nothing. That said, I intended more to be pro-Postgres rather than anti-MySQL (it's a great piece of software, other DBs and Postgres learn from it all the time, zheap[0] exists to replicate what they've built, for example).

I also have to admit that I definitely want postgres every time I see MySQL. Maybe I need to read more on just how easy and amazing MySQL can be. Links welcome!

[0]: https://cybertec-postgresql.github.io/zheap/

Postgres's dominance is well deserved, of course. My only concerns with it, both are actively worked on, are bloat management (significant for update heavy workloads and programmers used to the MySQL model of rollback segments) and the scaling of concurrency (going over 500 connections). Bloat was taken over by Cybertec[1] after stalling for a bit and is funded (yay), while concurrency was also enhanced out of Microsoft [2]. All in all, an excellent future for our beloved Postgres.

[1] https://github.com/cybertec-postgresql/zheap