Ovee.js VS Vue.js

Ovee.js is an optionally reactive framework, built with your existing markup in mind. It differentiates from Vue as it's designed to work mainly with existing, server-side rendered markup. This makes it best suited as a replacement for aged, jQuery-based stacks for building WordPress-based websites. The library provides ready-made integration with Barba.js. It's also integrated with lit-html, so the components can be client-side rendered for parts of your project. Built by Vue enthusiasts, underneath Ovee.js uses Vue modules to provide reactivity features.

Ovee.js is an optionally reactive framework, built with your existing markup in mind. In comparison to Stimulus, it pushes all the bindings from HTML to JS (using directives API) and gives you more freedom in how you want to use it. It also provides integration with lit-html, so the components can be client-side rendered for parts of your project. The library is best suited to use on small-to-medium-sized website builds, rather than large scale web apps and provides ready-made integration with Barba.js.

As the library is still fresh, the community is still to come. But, what is important - our team is using Ovee.js on daily basis, so we are commited to maintain and improve it in future. If you have any questions or ideas, don’t hesitate to catch us via Twitter (@owlsdepartment) or through GitHub Issues.

Vuejs

Vue.js is a big favorite for making websites because it's easy to use and fits in well with other stuff. Many people worldwide are using it, and the community keeps growing.

Vue has a thriving ecosystem with a wide range of third-party libraries and plugins available for extending its functionality. These libraries cover everything from state management to routing, making it easy for developers to find solutions to common problems and enhance their development workflow. As of this writing, Vue has 200k GitHub stars.

6. Vue.js

I have got the privilege of working on Vue 2 couple of months ago and its really amazing framework to work with .

Angular is as little innovative for web frameworks as Firefox-ESR is for browsers. It merely keeps copying features from other frameworks - just many years later. It is a chronically outdated framework that always struggles to keep up with its competitors. It would be ok if those were deliberate design decisions, but if the features get copied some day anyway, what is the point? Why not do it the right way from the start?

For example, this update brings us computed properties, an essential feature for any complex performant web application that was made popular by Vue.js 10 years ago [1]. And now in 2023 we get it in Angular, essentially a confirmation by its devs that its lack has always been a design error.

I also cannot understand the "mature" argument. For example, it took five years for documentation on `` to arrive [2]. This is something I'd expect from the side project of a lone programmer, not an enterprise-level framework.

The only upsides of Angular are its "batteries included" approach and the (debatable) default of RXJS, while the downsides are plenty.

[1] https://github.com/vuejs/vue/tree/218557cdec830a629252f4a9e2...

It's down since months. https://github.com/vuejs/vue/issues/11867

{ "user": "vuejs", "repo": "vue", "url": "https://github.com/vuejs/vue", "stars": 201555, "description": "🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.", "topics": [ "javascript", "framework", "vue", "frontend" ], "label": "repository", "commitCount": 3544 }

Vue.js is a progressive open-source MVVM frontend JavaScript framework that is designed to be implemented incrementally since the core library focuses only on the presentation layer. Nevertheless, this framework is used for building UI (user interfaces) and complex single-page applications with modern tools and libraries to support them. It enables you to take advantage of libraries for client-side routing and state management when you need it.