orchest
Grafana
orchest | Grafana | |
---|---|---|
44 | 380 | |
4,022 | 60,503 | |
0.1% | 0.8% | |
4.5 | 10.0 | |
11 months ago | 6 days ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
orchest
-
Decent low code options for orchestration and building data flows?
You can check out our OSS https://github.com/orchest/orchest
- Build ML workflows with Jupyter notebooks
-
Building container images in Kubernetes, how would you approach it?
The code example is part of our ELT/data pipeline tool called Orchest: https://github.com/orchest/orchest/
-
Launch HN: Patterns (YC S21) ā A much faster way to build and deploy data apps
First want to say congrats to the Patterns team for creating a gorgeous looking tool. Very minimal and approachable. Massive kudos!
Disclaimer: we're building something very similar and I'm curious about a couple of things.
One of the questions our users have asked us often is how to minimize the dependence on "product specific" components/nodes/steps. For example, if you write CI for GitHub Actions you may use a bunch of GitHub Action references.
Looking at the `graph.yml` in some of the examples you shared you use a similar approach (e.g. patterns/openai-completion@v4). That means that whenever you depend on such components your automation/data pipeline becomes more tied to the specific tool (GitHub Actions/Patterns), effectively locking in users.
How are you helping users feel comfortable with that problem (I don't want to invest in something that's not portable)? It's something we've struggled with ourselves as we're expanding the "out of the box" capabilities you get.
Furthermore, would have loved to see this as an open source project. But I guess the second best thing to open source is some open source contributions and `dcp` and `common-model` look quite interesting!
For those who are curious, I'm one of the authors of https://github.com/orchest/orchest
-
Argo became a graduated CNCF project
Haven't tried it. In its favor, Argo is vendor neutral and is really easy to set up in a local k8s environment like docker for desktop or minikube. If you already use k8s for configuration, service discovery, secret management, etc, it's dead simple to set up and use (avoiding configuration having to learn a whole new workflow configuration language in addition to k8s). The big downside is that it doesn't have a visual DAG editor (although that might be a positive for engineers having to fix workflows written by non-programmers), but the relatively bare-metal nature of Argo means that it's fairly easy to use it as an underlying engine for a more opinionated or lower-code framework (orchest is a notable one out now).
- Ideas for infrastructure and tooling to use for frequent model retraining?
-
Looking for a mentor in MLOps. I am a lead developer.
If youād like to try something for you data workflows thatās vendor agnostic (k8s based) and open source you can check out our project: https://github.com/orchest/orchest
-
Is there a good way to trigger data pipelines by event instead of cron?
You can find it here: https://github.com/orchest/orchest Convenience install script: https://github.com/orchest/orchest#installation
-
How do you deal with parallelising parts of an ML pipeline especially on Python?
We automatically provide container level parallelism in Orchest: https://github.com/orchest/orchest
-
Launch HN: Sematic (YC S22) ā Open-source framework to build ML pipelines faster
For people in this thread interested in what this tool is an alternative to: Airflow, Luigi, Kubeflow, Kedro, Flyte, Metaflow, Sagemaker Pipelines, GCP Vertex Workbench, Azure Data Factory, Azure ML, Dagster, DVC, ClearML, Prefect, Pachyderm, and Orchest.
Disclaimer: author of Orchest https://github.com/orchest/orchest
Grafana
- Grafana: From Dashboards to Centralized Observability
-
Docker Log Observability: Analyzing Container Logs in HashiCorp Nomad with Vector, Loki, and Grafana
Monitoring application logs is a crucial aspect of the software development and deployment lifecycle. In this post, we'll delve into the process of observing logs generated by Docker container applications operating within HashiCorp Nomad. With the aid of Grafana, Vector, and Loki, we'll explore effective strategies for log analysis and visualization, enhancing visibility and troubleshooting capabilities within your Nomad environment.
-
Golang: out-of-box backpressure handling with gRPC, proven by a Grafana dashboard
To help us visualize these scenarios, we'll build a Grafana Dashboard so we can follow along.
-
Monitoring, Observability, and Telemetry Explained
Visualization and Analysis: Choose a tool with intuitive and customizable dashboards, charts, and visualizations. A question to ask is, "Are the visualization features of this tool user-friendly and adaptable to our team's specific needs?" Tools like Grafana and Kibana provide powerful visualization capabilities.
-
4 facets of API monitoring you should implement
Prometheus: Open-source monitoring system. Often used together with Grafana.
- Grafana: Open and composable observability and data visualization platform
-
The Mechanics of Silicon Valley Pump and Dump Schemes
Grafana
-
Reverse engineering the Grafana API to get the data from a dashboard
Yes I'm aware that Grafana is open source but the method I used to find the API endpoints is far quicker than digging through hundreds of files in a codebase I'm not familiar with.
-
Building an Observability Stack with Docker
So, you will add one last container to allow us to visualize this data: Grafana, an open-source analytics and visualization platform that allows us to see traces and metrics simply. You can set Grafana to read data from both Tempo and Prometheus by setting them as datastores with the following grafana.datasource.yaml config file:
-
How to collect metrics from node.js applications in PM2 with exporting to Prometheus
In example above, we use 2 additional parameters: code (HTTP response code) and page (page identifier), which provide detailed statistics. For example, you can build such graphs in Grafana:
What are some alternatives?
docker-airflow - Docker Apache Airflow
Thingsboard - Open-source IoT Platform - Device management, data collection, processing and visualization.
hookdeck-cli - Receive events (e.g. webhooks) in your development environment
Apache Superset - Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform [Moved to: https://github.com/apache/superset]
ploomber - The fastest ā”ļø way to build data pipelines. Develop iteratively, deploy anywhere. āļø
Heimdall - An Application dashboard and launcher
n8n - Free and source-available fair-code licensed workflow automation tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.
Wazuh - Wazuh - The Open Source Security Platform. Unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads.
label-studio - Label Studio is a multi-type data labeling and annotation tool with standardized output format
Thingspeak - ThingSpeak is an open source āInternet of Thingsā application and API to store and retrieve data from things using HTTP over the Internet or via a Local Area Network. With ThingSpeak, you can create sensor logging applications, location tracking applications, and a social network of things with status updates.
Node RED - Low-code programming for event-driven applications
uptime-kuma - A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool