opentelemetry-specificatio
Grafana
Our great sponsors
opentelemetry-specificatio | Grafana | |
---|---|---|
7 | 379 | |
- | 60,395 | |
- | 1.7% | |
- | 10.0 | |
- | about 18 hours ago | |
TypeScript | ||
- | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
opentelemetry-specificatio
-
Migrating to OpenTelemetry
Sure, happy to provide more specifics!
Our main issue was the lack of a synchronous gauge. The officially supported asynchronous API of registering a callback function to report a gauge metric is very different from how we were doing things before, and would have required lots of refactoring of our code. Instead, we wrote a wrapper that exposes a synchronous-like API: https://gist.github.com/yolken-airplane/027867b753840f7d15d6....
It seems like this is a common feature request across many of the SDKs, and it's in the process of being fixed in some of them (https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specificatio...)? I'm not sure what the plans are for the golang SDK specifically.
Another, more minor issue, is the lack of support for "constant" attributes that are applied to all metrics. We use these to identify the app, among other use cases, so we added wrappers around the various "Add", "Record", "Observe", etc. calls that automatically add these. (It's totally possible that this is supported and I missed it, in which case please let me know!).
Overall, the SDK was generally well-written and well-documented, we just needed some extra work to make the interfaces more similar to the ones were were using before.
-
OpenTelemetry in 2023
Two problems with OpenTelemetry:
1. It doesn't know what the hell it is. Is it a semantic standard? Is a protocol? It is a facade? What layer of abstraction does it provide? Answer: All of the above! All the things! All the layers!
2. No one from OpenTelemetry has actually tried instrumenting a library. And if they have, they haven't the first suggestion on how instrumenters should actually use metrics, traces, and logs. Do you write to all three? To one? I asked this question two years ago, not a single response. [1]
[1] https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specificatio...
-
Go standard library: structured, leveled logging
That's why you have otel logging: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specificatio...
-
Monarch: Google’s Planet-Scale In-Memory Time Series Database
There are a large amount of subtle tradeoffs around the bucketing scheme (log, vs. log-linear, base) and memory layout (sparse, dense, chunked) the amount of configurability in the histogram space (circllhist, DDSketch, HDRHistogram, ...). A good overview is this discussion here:
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specificatio...
As for the circllhist: There are no knobs to turn. It uses base 10 and two decimal digits of precision. In the last 8 years I have not seen a single use-case in the operational domain where this was not appropriate.
-
OpenTelemetry
A good place to look at is the milestones on GitHub: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specificatio...
Logging is still experimental in the spec. Metrics API is feature freeze and the protocol is stable, so it's more on language SDKs to stabilize their implementations. This is a focus for several of them right now.
Grafana
-
Docker Log Observability: Analyzing Container Logs in HashiCorp Nomad with Vector, Loki, and Grafana
Monitoring application logs is a crucial aspect of the software development and deployment lifecycle. In this post, we'll delve into the process of observing logs generated by Docker container applications operating within HashiCorp Nomad. With the aid of Grafana, Vector, and Loki, we'll explore effective strategies for log analysis and visualization, enhancing visibility and troubleshooting capabilities within your Nomad environment.
-
Golang: out-of-box backpressure handling with gRPC, proven by a Grafana dashboard
To help us visualize these scenarios, we'll build a Grafana Dashboard so we can follow along.
-
Monitoring, Observability, and Telemetry Explained
Visualization and Analysis: Choose a tool with intuitive and customizable dashboards, charts, and visualizations. A question to ask is, "Are the visualization features of this tool user-friendly and adaptable to our team's specific needs?" Tools like Grafana and Kibana provide powerful visualization capabilities.
-
4 facets of API monitoring you should implement
Prometheus: Open-source monitoring system. Often used together with Grafana.
- Grafana: Open and composable observability and data visualization platform
-
The Mechanics of Silicon Valley Pump and Dump Schemes
Grafana
-
Reverse engineering the Grafana API to get the data from a dashboard
Yes I'm aware that Grafana is open source but the method I used to find the API endpoints is far quicker than digging through hundreds of files in a codebase I'm not familiar with.
-
Building an Observability Stack with Docker
So, you will add one last container to allow us to visualize this data: Grafana, an open-source analytics and visualization platform that allows us to see traces and metrics simply. You can set Grafana to read data from both Tempo and Prometheus by setting them as datastores with the following grafana.datasource.yaml config file:
-
How to collect metrics from node.js applications in PM2 with exporting to Prometheus
In example above, we use 2 additional parameters: code (HTTP response code) and page (page identifier), which provide detailed statistics. For example, you can build such graphs in Grafana:
-
Root Cause Chronicles: Quivering Queue
Robin switched to the Grafana dashboard tab, and sure enough, the 5xx volume on web service was rising. It had not hit the critical alert thresholds yet, but customers had already started noticing.
What are some alternatives?
skywalking - APM, Application Performance Monitoring System
Thingsboard - Open-source IoT Platform - Device management, data collection, processing and visualization.
SLF4J - Simple Logging Facade for Java
Apache Superset - Apache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration Platform [Moved to: https://github.com/apache/superset]
opentelemetry-specification - Specifications for OpenTelemetry
Heimdall - An Application dashboard and launcher
semantic-conventions - Defines standards for generating consistent, accessible telemetry across a variety of domains
Wazuh - Wazuh - The Open Source Security Platform. Unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads.
zipkin-api - Zipkin's language independent model and HTTP Api Definitions
Thingspeak - ThingSpeak is an open source “Internet of Things” application and API to store and retrieve data from things using HTTP over the Internet or via a Local Area Network. With ThingSpeak, you can create sensor logging applications, location tracking applications, and a social network of things with status updates.
jvm-serializers - Benchmark comparing serialization libraries on the JVM
uptime-kuma - A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool