ocicl
oras
ocicl | oras | |
---|---|---|
4 | 8 | |
114 | 1,278 | |
11.5% | 3.8% | |
7.9 | 9.3 | |
1 day ago | 1 day ago | |
Common Lisp | Go | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ocicl
-
Steel Bank Common Lisp
Check out ocicl as an alternative to quicklisp if you are concerned about security. Code is distributed using the OCI ecosystem (https by default, proxies work, sigstore integration, etc). https://github.com/ocicl/ocicl
-
sbcl - require
If you are willing to try switching from quicklisp to ocicl, then you'll find that ocicl *does* work with authenticating proxies on Windows. https://github.com/ocicl/ocicl
-
Ocicl – An ASDF system distribution and management tool for Common Lisp
> ... but still only supports one niche operating system.
1. Linux is not a niche in the target market for this project.
2. The project is written in Common Lisp with hard dependencies on SBCL-provided libraries[1], so there's reason to suspect it should work on other OSes supported by SBCL.
3. Sure, the presence of Makefile and sb-posix imply it requires a POSIX compliant OS, but Linux is not the only one that fits the bill.
4. The included Linux-only binary 'oras' is clearly a vendored artifact, not part of this project, and clearly an OCI client. A simple search shows it is indeed cross-platform[2].
Perhaps you should try what almost every Linux user has had to do when encountering software actually built for only one "niche" operating system that they want to use on their OS: look.
1. https://github.com/ocicl/ocicl/blob/170aff0/ocicl.asd#L34
2. https://github.com/oras-project/oras/releases
oras
- Distribute Artifacts Across OCI Registries
- OCI image from dockerfile
-
RFC 6920: Naming Things with Hashes
Interesting, I'd not known of this RFC before.
Another example of a content-addressed data store could be OCI registries (more commonly known as container image registries). Using them to store arbitrary artefacts is quite well supported now: https://oras.land/
-
sbcl - require
See https://oras.land/
-
Ocicl – An ASDF system distribution and management tool for Common Lisp
> ... but still only supports one niche operating system.
1. Linux is not a niche in the target market for this project.
2. The project is written in Common Lisp with hard dependencies on SBCL-provided libraries[1], so there's reason to suspect it should work on other OSes supported by SBCL.
3. Sure, the presence of Makefile and sb-posix imply it requires a POSIX compliant OS, but Linux is not the only one that fits the bill.
4. The included Linux-only binary 'oras' is clearly a vendored artifact, not part of this project, and clearly an OCI client. A simple search shows it is indeed cross-platform[2].
Perhaps you should try what almost every Linux user has had to do when encountering software actually built for only one "niche" operating system that they want to use on their OS: look.
1. https://github.com/ocicl/ocicl/blob/170aff0/ocicl.asd#L34
2. https://github.com/oras-project/oras/releases
-
Looking for an artifact store for generic assets, rather than specially-formatted packages or containers. Thinking maybe ORAS, but wondering if there are other options.
oras isn't that unpopular, Helm is using it as an SDK for example. Here are other projects who are using it. https://github.com/oras-project/oras/network/dependents
- OCI Registry as Storage
What are some alternatives?
quicklisp-client - Quicklisp client.
regclient - Docker and OCI Registry Client in Go and tooling using those libraries.
ql-https - HTTPS support for Quicklisp via curl
containerd - An open and reliable container runtime