observable
format
observable | format | |
---|---|---|
9 | 19 | |
516 | 1,904 | |
1.4% | 0.8% | |
8.2 | 9.4 | |
about 13 hours ago | 4 days ago | |
Bikeshed | C# | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
observable
- Proposal: Signals as a Built-In Primitive of JavaScript
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
> especially since Observables have been widely available and actively worked on for a long time, without seeing wide adoption
Take a look at "Userland libraries" section [0] of the proposal (almost certainly written by Ben). He argues that observables get reinvented in the userland in various libraries over and over again. It is a primitive, like a Promise, only better.
[0] - https://github.com/WICG/observable?tab=readme-ov-file#userla...
- Observable API Proposal
- Observable API proposal
-
You Don't Need to “Learn” Svelte: Embracing the Simplicity of JavaScript
Perhaps this falls into the repetitive boilerplate category you referred to, but if you want framework-agnostic domain objects that still work well with Svelte, create your own using the observer pattern.
Create an object with a subscribe method and whatever other methods make sense for updating its state. Svelte will treat it like one of its stores, and it will work with the $ syntax. It can be used with React via its `useSyncExternalStore` hook. It can be used with SolidJS via its `from` utility.
If you don't want to handle the set-up boilerplate, you could use another library like Effector or RxJS, but of course, that means another dependency. There is a gradual move to make something like this a part of the platform[1], but who knows when or if it will land.
[1] https://github.com/domfarolino/observable
format
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
C# has https://github.com/dotnet/format but because C# is, well, not JS, the importance of linting is far less significant. Instead, there are hundreds of out-of-box analyzers that highlight problematic patterns or likely mistakes in the code and there are even more that you can enable through extensions (like Roslynator) or through packages that are 'dotnet add package' away.
On the package management - it couldn't be more different between Java and C# and it's incorrect to compare the two. .NET has few if any issues of the former.
-
Enhancing Your Open-Source Project with Static Analysis Tools
In my project, I incorporated a source code formatter provided by the dotnet framework. I also added .editorconfig file to the root directory of my project. This file defines formatting rules, such as indent style and indent size, ensuring consistency throughout the codebase.
-
Rider - Formatting across projects
However: It would appear that dotnet has a lot of extension values for editorconfig - does Rider support all of those? Some of those? Is there documentation of any extension?
-
100% deterministic c# formatter
Like this post explains: https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/879
-
Dotnet, C#, code format on JetBrain IDE Rider
Dotnet Format
-
Enforcing .NET code style rules at compile time
Oh, I'm using .net format. https://github.com/dotnet/format . I will take a look at csharpier to compare both :)
- Migrating from JS/TS ecosystem to Blazor
-
Which linters are you using for CI environments?
- dotnet format but this is not a linter I think?
-
[Avançado] Criando templates customizados em C#
Para formatar seu código instale o dotnet format e execute o seguinte comando:
-
How do you format?
dotnet format does not break lines when they get too long, or collapse lines if they are too short and could be fit on the same line. See https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/246. Another way to say it - no matter where you put linebreaks in a given code file, csharpier will produce the same output. dotnet format would produce a different output based on where current line breaks exist.