Nuxt 3 VS Tailwind CSS

- https://github.com/nuxt/framework: An intuitive framework for building web applications, built for the edge.

It uses Nuxi for Command line interface,

Note, the repo linked below, https://github.com/danielroe/nuxt-zero-js, was an experiment that I subsequently moved into Nuxt core: https://github.com/nuxt/framework/pull/7248. I plan to update it to test out per-route zero-JS via a route rule.

I asked this before on the Github discussion https://github.com/nuxt/framework/discussions/10073, but I haven't found an answer yet.

Also one I've reported a long time ago, that's still an issue today: If you start the Nuxt dev server without create the server/ folder, Nuxt isn't going to be able to read any of your server/api files. You have to create the folder and restart the dev server. Only then, it will start detecting your server files. This is an issue on both Windows and Linux.

Perhaps this thread can help you.

But there is a catch, nuxt.config does not allow functions in it. And it could be bother to mention this in every single page. Also, the later part is supposed to act like a Default or Fallback. Hmm.. Now what? Well, that where plugins system comes in. I can create a Plugin named title and add this logic there, which will be implemented on every page. Also, Nuxt devs mentioned this approach here.

I've found a matching issue with a solution I can use as a hotfix for now: https://github.com/nuxt/framework/issues/6648

https://github.com/nuxt/framework/issues/3587 (upstream Vue bug maybe?) https://github.com/nuxt/framework/issues/8634 https://github.com/nuxt/framework/issues/8611

This issue is where I started, and I noticed that in my project, setting the cookie header manually, or through a composable on the server-side doesn't actually set it in the browser (it doesn't show up in the developer tools). They've listed workarounds, but they're just that - the first link (when it comes back up, will show a messy composable you can write). Everything works fine with `axios` (instead of their built-in data fetching APIs), but the request seems to be executed twice on page load for some reason.

Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs.

First, you need to make sure that you have a working Tailwind CSS project…

Tailwind CSS

With better CSS approaches like TailwindCSS and Vanilla Extract (which we're heavily using) it's much easier to maintain the UI and make sure it doesn't change unexpectedly. No more conflicting CSS classes, much less CSS specificity issues and much less CSS code in general.

This app was built with Svelte Kit, Tailwind CSS, and many other technologies. For a full rundown, please visit the GitHub repository

Unlike Tailwind, which has over 77,000 stars on GitHub, Mojo CSS has about 200 stars on GitHub. But the Mojo CSS documentation is fairly good and you can find most of the information you’ll need there.

JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite

- Performance is a feature.

Another common interpretation of brutalism is aesthetic, reacting to overly complicated user interfaces by creating simpler, more direct ones. Tailwind CSS (https://tailwindcss.com), one of today's most popular CSS libraries, promotes this approach in its component examples. There's also a neat library I've seen recently called "Neobrutalism Components" for React that I like (https://neobrutalism-components.vercel.app), providing components with a similar look and feel to Gumroad. This might more accurately be called 'Neo-Brutalism,' as noted in the comments.

A more engineering-centric interpretation of Brutalism focuses on form, structure, and efficiency, drawing significantly from brutalist architecture principles. Apart from the user interface itself, most mobile, desktop, and web applications are extremely bloated and often perform worse than sites from 10 years ago did. While one HTML file might be "less brutalist" than the original HN site, it is substantially more brutalist than any HN mobile app in existence, and offers nearly identical functionality.

A broader interpretation of brutalism, which could be termed 'Meta-Brutalism,' is embodied in the overall experience on this site through UX flows. Yes, in the strictest sense, the original HN site is more Brutalist in many ways, but it only shows 30 articles at a time and does not function as a PWA. For this site, the experience of reading 10 stories is arguably less brutalist, but for quickly browsing through several pages and skimming articles (which is how I read HN) it is a lot faster, and in my opinion, more Brutalist.

My primary inspiration was addressing software and tool bloat in UIs rather than strictly adhering to every principle set forth by David Bryant Copeland. I don't find it convincing that this site "isn't brutalist" compared to really any other experience apart from the Main HN site, and I would argue the overall experience is more brutalist in its performance and scrolling behavior.

As a side note: I generally don't like Brutalist architecture that much although I believe it is unfairly maligned. I visited the Salk Institute once and enjoyed it though (https://www.archdaily.com/61288/ad-classics-salk-institute-l...).

- Staff Software Engineer ($275k/yr): https://tailwindcss.com/careers/staff-software-engineer

We're small, independent, and profitable, with a team of just 6 people doing millions in revenue, and growing sustainably every year. You'd work directly with the founders on open-source software used by millions of people.

If you like the idea of working on a small team that cares about craft and isn't trying to achieve VC scale, I think this is a pretty awesome place to do your best work.

Instead of Booststrap, I used Tailwind CSS as the CSS library.