notion-sdk-js VS web-vitals

Here is an example of how to create a new page in your Notion workspace with the blocks converted from the original HTML. We use the @notionhq/client library and you'll need to have a valid Notion API key and database ID:

Provides data fetching functions that add some utility to the notion-sdk

Thousands of great APIs run their developer hubs on ReadMe, where our customers are already documenting every little detail about their API using the OpenAPI Specification. This got us thinking: “the OpenAPI Specification already provides a ton of valuable information about an API, what if we use this to generate an SDK that’s as good as Notion’s JavaScript SDK”?

The official guide actually suggests to poll all the time and compare to local DB to imitate webhooks.

Here are the links if you need them JavaScript https://github.com/makenotion/notion-sdk-js

Hey, I created a Notion automation in Python that sends an Email to a given recipient when the value of a select property in a Notion database is changed. To send the Email, the SendGrid API is used. I inspired myself at the official Notion node.js implementation.

Go To Documentation

Google Core Vitals now represent the most important metrics to focus on when it comes to technical SEO. Google Core Vitals are a set of standardized metrics that Google uses to evaluate the user experience offered by a web page and assign it a technical SEO grade. Several tools exist to measure and report technical SEO performance, but the most reliable is Google Lighthouse.

-https://www.patterns.dev/ -https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/blob/main/text/0188-server-components.md -https://dev.to/this-is-learning/qwik-the-post-modern-framework-3c5o -https://dev.to/this-is-learning/astro-framework-169m -https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2019/02/rendering-on-the-web -https://web.dev/vitals/

Image source: https://web.dev/vitals/

You will be pleased to know that isn’t actually the case and it’s a suite of metrics instead known collectively as core web vitals https://web.dev/vitals/

Let's go back to 2020, this was when Google made a big change regarding their performance rating -- they introduced the Core Web Vitals. I want to discuss this timeframe because it was the last point where there is clear comparable data between the performance metric set (5 metrics) and the Core Web Vitals (3 metrics). The Core Web Vitals is a subset of the performance metric set.

Beyond elevating the user experience, another clear benefit of speeding up the rendering of a website is search engine optimization (SEO). Speed is so important to ranking well on search engines that it’s included in Google’s published description of what their indexers use to rank websites for performance, called Core Web Vitals.

This is something we won't ever be able to measure, as it depends on how people perceive the overall experience on their device, but it boils down to perceived performance. So by all means, optimize your mobile apps and web frontends, test on old devices and slow networks (even if only emulated), and monitor their real-user performance (e.g. through Web Vitals). As part of performance testing, have a look on electricity use, as it will both be directly associated with emissions to produce that electricity, and be perceptible by the user (battery drain). And don't forget to account for the app downloads as part of the overall perceived performance: light mobile apps that don't need to be updated every other day, frontend JS and CSS that can be cached and won't update several times a day either (defeating the cache).