nix-direnv
niv
nix-direnv | niv | |
---|---|---|
27 | 16 | |
1,460 | 1,462 | |
3.7% | - | |
9.0 | 6.3 | |
8 days ago | about 2 months ago | |
Nix | Haskell | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
nix-direnv
- A faster, persistent implementation of direnv's use_Nix and use_flake
-
How do multiple versions of the package internally work?
BTW: I personally use direnv with nix-direnv. This basically works by setting your shell with proper tooling when you enter the directory.
-
I have a few beginner question, what is the difference between nix shell/env and what is the difference between flakes/home-manager?
I'm not sure what you mean by nix env, maybe you are referring to nix-direnv?
-
Just a reminder to make sure Garbage Collection is running
Although currently I'm using direnv + nix-direnv. Keep in mind that direnv has builtin nix support which is very basic and doesn't do any caching. So you still needs this add-on to preserve roots.
-
What do you install with configuration.nix and home manager
I distinguish between system level things and user level things, even though I don't really have different users on my machine. I install the bare minimum number of packages + a lot of different drivers in the configuration.nix, and desktop and editor related things in HM. For development environment, I have environment per project using mkShell and https://github.com/nix-community/nix-direnv, which allows you to switch to the specific environment once you cd into the directory. (Although I do have python installed globally with some commonly used packages such as numpy, so I can just start python and write something when I need to, without creating an environment)
-
How do YOU use your PKMS?
I further make my software projects so that when I click a link I go into an environment pre-loaded with their dependencies so dropping in/out of projects is always frictionless. I do this with the reproducibility guarantees of nix, along with glue like nix-direnv and envrc-mode to direnv.
-
Nuenv: an experimental Nushell environment for Nix
(I also use nix-direnv)
-
NixOS + Haskell best practices circa March 2023
direnv
-
Minimal approach for python devel environment with flake
Personally I use nix-direnv. No longer the need to run nix develop or nix-shell. By setting up a .envrc with either use nix or use flake it will automatically install all the packages from default/shell.nix or flake.nix
-
Nix and envrc
Direnv is installed using the nix-direnv installation instructions under "Via configuration.nix in NixOS". I read some recommendations that envrc.el is a better alternative then direnv.el, and after some testing I have to agree. (envrc-global-mode) is enabled in my config. This works perfectly with a normal emacs instance.
niv
-
NixOS + Haskell best practices circa March 2023
niv
-
Pulling themes from a git project: the nix way?
Flakes work. An alternative is niv which was once popular and provides a good developer experience.
-
What are the biggest Pain Points with NIX? And what makes it worth the pain?
Essentially you can just think of it as a standardized default.nix/shell.nix with built-in Niv integration.
-
Our Roadmap for Nix
I agree that the FP part is not the only issue. It's that the community feels a bit more academic/I'll fix this for myself in the way that works best for me.
You can indeed achieve some reproducibility with Docker. It's tricky though, as you'd have to pin exact package versions of software. If you'd `FROM ubuntu:$VERION`, and would run an `apt-get update`, you're not guaranteed to get the same software.
Nix is like ZFS, as that it breaks the wall between two previously distinct area's. Those being building software, and installing/configuration software on your OS. It's quite different from the snapshot-everything methodology that Docker uses. Yeah, one can split in multi-stage images etc, but than you'll be keeping track of which dependencies need to be moved between the stages yourself, in a manner that cannot be abstracted away, so you're doomed to repeat the same patterns over and over again.
People also state that LVM + ext3 is more than sufficient compared to the complexity of ZFS. They miss out on the fact on how much more fine grained solutions are possible with ZFS.
I've used niv [0] before flakes arrived, and am actually still using that instead of flakes. The experimental nature of them has scared me away from them, as I'm not daily involved in this ecosystem at the moment.
[0] https://github.com/nmattia/niv#niv
-
Simplest way to set up neovim
You can use something like Niv to manage additional sources. I use it to fetch some Emacs packages, for example ligature.el. Then you update the package using $ niv update.
-
Unstable vs Stable channels
One thing that made this easier was switching from using Nix channels to explicitly pinning my dependencies with Niv. I honestly never fully understood how channels worked, and it's just much nicer to have everything specified in my Git repo. The exact commit of Nixpkgs that I'm using is in my sources.json file, so "reverting" just means checking out an older commit of my configs from Git then running nixos-rebuild switch. If I were redoing my dotfiles today I'd probably use Nix Flakes rather than Niv, but I suspect that Niv is still an easier option to get started with.
-
Remove unused niv packages
Does someone know of a way to remove unused pinned packages via [niv](https://github.com/nmattia/niv)?
-
How to downgrade single package?
Pin nixpkgs, and version control it. If you're using flakes, then just version control the flake.lock alongside your configuration. If you're not using flakes, you can use niv to easily pin nipxkgs, at the expense of some boiler plate.
- Compiling emacs is killing me
-
Ditch Your Version Manager
This... This is laughable. How do I install ruby 2.6.8? Oh, there's no ruby_2_6_8, because of course there isn't. And this could be difference between a secure system and all your base are belong to us.
And they call this reproducible builds?
And that's before getting into the ridiculous
--- start quote ---
All the software that we installed depends on the specific version of the nixpkgs channel that we installed on our system [whose only version is a commit hash in a git repo]
--- end quote ---
So you need an extra tool [2] for, quote, "painless dependencies for Nix projects."
Yes, sure. I'm definitely ditching my version managers in favor of this tool, that hasn't solved these issues in 18 years of its existence.
[1] https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=21.05&from=0&size=...
[2] https://github.com/nmattia/niv
What are some alternatives?
devshell - Per project developer environments
leksah - Haskell IDE
flake-utils - Pure Nix flake utility functions [maintainer=@zimbatm]
update-nix-fetchgit - A program to automatically update fetchgit values in Nix expressions
devenv - Fast, Declarative, Reproducible, and Composable Developer Environments
ghcid - Very low feature GHCi based IDE
lorri - Your project's nix-env
elm-make
flake-templates - A collection of barebone Nix shells for starting a project, provided as flake templates
hpc-threshold - Small utility for validating whether HPC result is above defined thresholds
naersk - Build Rust projects in Nix - no configuration, no code generation, no IFD, sandbox friendly.
ihaskell - A Haskell kernel for the Jupyter project.