nextjs-tailwind-ionic-capacitor-starter
sucrase
Our great sponsors
nextjs-tailwind-ionic-capacitor-starter | sucrase | |
---|---|---|
9 | 26 | |
1,552 | 5,583 | |
- | - | |
5.6 | 6.1 | |
about 2 months ago | 2 months ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
nextjs-tailwind-ionic-capacitor-starter
-
Solito – React Native and Next.js, Unified
wow, that's a weird limitation.
The README says: "SSR is currently disabled for the Next.js app as the app will be fully client-side rendered for iOS and Android. This is a limitation we are working to address in a future update."
I guess it's because CapacitorJS pre-bundles the entire PWA for the App Stores:
"Of course, you also could load the app completely remotely by changing the server.url configuration for Capacitor to point to your SSR'ed Next.js app, but that has other challenges such as App Store approval if the app doesn't check the boxes for Apple to qualify it as an app that has enough native integration (at that point this is on you, not Capacitor)"
https://github.com/mlynch/nextjs-tailwind-ionic-capacitor-st...
But I don't understand why SSR would be disabled for the NextJS PWA on the web?
Maybe Max Lynch aka. @mlynch aka. @yesimahuman could provide some insight here.
-
What framework do you use for styling?
If you want to use something like tailwind to customize the content of your pages, that is a decent option. You would use Ionic for the shell and Tailwind for your page designs. Take a look at this example if you want to explore that route (in React though): https://github.com/mlynch/nextjs-tailwind-ionic-capacitor-starter
-
Any recommendation to port a production SPA to Nextjs?
Max Lynch from Ionic has a great repo demonstrating this. He uses it to get Next to work with Ionic and Capacitor but the idea is essentially the same.
-
Next.js 12
Agreed! Next.js works great with this model! I’d recommend Capacitor over Cordova (similar but more modern). Here’s an example: https://github.com/mlynch/nextjs-tailwind-ionic-capacitor-st...
-
Next-Auth equivalent CRA
You can use Next with React Router, making it function exactly as a React app with nested routes. This project shows this working with Ionic's router, but the same setup can be used with React Router for the same outcome.
-
Converting a nextjs web app into a mobile app
Also, note that this repository is a boilerplate for all 3, which uses ionic capacitor, in one repository: https://github.com/mlynch/nextjs-tailwind-ionic-capacitor-starter , I guess it is not using nextjs SSR capability though.
-
Build Mobile Apps with Tailwind CSS, Next.js, Ionic Framework, and Capacitor
If you're confused by all the project names and how they work together, don't worry, I'll break down each part of the stack each project is concerned with, along with some visuals and code samples demonstrating how all the projects work together. At the end I'll share a starter project with these technologies installed and working together that can form the foundation of your next app.
sucrase
-
Show HN: JSX in Browser with Sucrase
Thanks. As for the code compilation, that can be tested and seen in https://sucrase.io/
The demo page is only to show how we can transpile JSX in browsers.
-
Created a simple online JavaScript Playground, it's a place for you to try out your code and ideas.
Thanks u/OutlandishnessKey953, the playground built with React, Docusaurus(https://docusaurus.io/), CodeMirror(https://codemirror.net/), Sucrase(https://sucrase.io/), etc.
-
The TypeScript compiler is now implemented internally with modules
Hi, Sucrase author here.
To be clear, the benchmark in the README does not allow JIT warm-up. The Sucrase numbers would be better if it did. From testing just now (add `warmUp: true` to `benchmarkJest`), Sucrase is a little over 3x faster than swc if you allow warm-up, but it seemed unfair to disregard warm-up for the comparison in the README.
It's certainly fair to debate whether 360k lines of code is a realistic codebase size for the benchmark; the higher-scale the test case, the better Sucrase looks.
> worse it disables esbuild and swc's multi-threading
At some point I'm hoping to update the README benchmark to run all tools in parallel, which should be more convincing despite the added variability: https://github.com/alangpierce/sucrase/issues/730 . In an ideal environment, the results are pretty much the same as a per-core benchmark, but I do expect that Node's parallelism overhead and the JIT warm-up cost across many cores would make Sucrase less competitive than the current numbers.
-
Should i switch to Typescript?
First, npm i -D sucrase to install sucrase. Now you can do node -r sucrase/register ./index.ts to run TypeScript code directly with Node.
-
🚀 Building your own Javascript Library with bare minimum
As you might know there are a lot of Javascript bundlers out there, such as webpack, sucrase, parcel, rollup and etc. Bear in mind, not because they have thousands of stars on Github that means they're the best. sometimes new libs are as good as the popular ones but they're still building up their image/popularity in the community. what I bring today is a not sooooo, popular JS bundler called esbuild.
-
Five coding interview questions I hate
Sucrase JS was 2x the speed of esBuild and 50% faster than SWC last I checked.
-
I’m Porting the TypeScript Type Checker Tsc to Go
Webpack does way more than esbuild, including running a typechecking compiler instead of just transpiling, running compilers able to downlevel emit to ES5 and providing a deep plugin architecture allowing you to hook into any bit you like. But yes, it hasn't been designed with speed in mind - it has been designed with maximum extensibility instead. Its the same reason why Babel is slow compared to sucrase (written in JS, currently faster than SWC and esbuild but doing somewhat less - https://github.com/alangpierce/sucrase)
tsc has in fact been designed with speed in mind (I've been following the project since before it ended up on GitHub). Going beyond 1 order of magnitude performance improvement is highly unlikely.
- Sucrase: A fast, pure-JavaScript transpiler for JavaScript/TypeScript
- GitHub - alangpierce/sucrase: Super-fast alternative to Babel for when you can target modern JS runtimes
- Sucrase: A fast JavaScript/TypeScript transpiler written in JavaScript
What are some alternatives?
Next.js - The React Framework
swc - Rust-based platform for the Web
vike - 🔨 Like Next.js / Nuxt but as do-one-thing-do-it-well Vite plugin.
ts-node - TypeScript execution and REPL for node.js
supabase - The open source Firebase alternative.
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
entr - Run arbitrary commands when files change
fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin - Webpack plugin that runs typescript type checker on a separate process.
swc-node - Faster ts-node without typecheck
dapr - Dapr is a portable, event-driven, runtime for building distributed applications across cloud and edge.
TypeScript - TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.