proposals VS grantshares

The only person who failed to put in effort in this situation is you. Did you review the first first lines of the proposal repo? There is literally a NEP (NEP-1) which precisely describes due process for suggesting an enhancement. If you can't be bothered to make a rational case for why any contributor should pay attention to your issue, how can you believe it should be given the time of day over any number of other suggested improvements?

Maybe you should think about it further, or tie it back to Forthewin brand. NEP refers to more than just tokens. https://github.com/neo-project/proposals

source: https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/pull/126

Here is the standard: https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/blob/nft/nep-11.mediawiki Sample for smart contract: https://github.com/neo-project/non-native-contracts/blob/master/src/NameService/NameService.cs

Neo is not intrinsically any more quantum-proof than any other blockchain that uses Elliptic Curve Cryptography (but note that the odds of quantum computers causing issues are lower than people think they are). On the other hand, Neo has previously proposed NeoQS (Neo Quantum Safe), a Lattice-based cryptographic approach that, if/when implemented, would make the already low practical risk even lower:

Its a bit old https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/blob/master/nep-9.mediawiki

The community funding DAO, GrantShares recently awarded a soul-bound NFT project that incentivizes blood donations in Nigeria, community NFT campaigns, iOS SDK development, academic studies, and more.