nanolooker VS nanoticker

nanolooker (Block explorer)

Pssst if you’d like to contribute some more https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker/tree/master/src/i18n/locales :) Great work on the medium article op!

Make sure to open a PR and include it to NanoLooker https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker/blob/master/src/pages/Faucets/faucets.json

If you have a GitHub you could make an issue so the devs know: https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker

no, see https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker/issues/16

Here is how it’s done on NanoLooker https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker/blob/master/server/ws/index.js you could also perhaps find a way to run back the chains and accumulate based on days to get the previous data

I can imagine that the filtering is done on the server side and the client just picks what version to display. This wouldn't work well with user configurable options. This is only speculation, though. The answer can be found here: https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker

The script is getting all the frontiers (~14m accounts) then for each it does account_balance where the balance and pending are counted as the « real » balance of the account, then for every of the 14m it does account_history https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker/blob/66cdaae3ab21daacd2d3ef43a7b7d7884d3d7b31/server/cron/distribution.js#L138 to get the last send / received transaction for the account https://docs.nano.org/commands/rpc-protocol/#account_history and then everything is calculated by month, so if last transaction was in feb, the account is dormant since march https://nanolooker.com/api/distribution it is to note that the script is not bullet proof and it is giving a general idea of the state, for example it takes 1.5h to run so if 10M nano was to change account during that time the data would sligltly be innacurate since it could calculate the same balance twice or miss it if the transfer timing coincide while its checking balances for all accounts

Added this week, everything is opensource https://github.com/running-coder/nanolooker/commit/e6c65fc2df7c7710082403a6bf9c69c1d1d8394d

Thanks man, it makes sense what you are saying. You are also correct in it's not an easy transfer. The API is just an api but nanoticker is a complex beast. It has come to a point that I don't even know how to set it up elsewhere. I do have some notes here and it's all open source https://github.com/Joohansson/nanoticker

nanoticker (global network monitor)