named-closure
Introspectable, readably-printable and redefinable closures (by kchanqvq)
Programming-Language-Benchmarks
Yet another implementation of computer language benchmarks game (by bpecsek)
named-closure | Programming-Language-Benchmarks | |
---|---|---|
2 | 1 | |
5 | 0 | |
- | - | |
2.9 | 0.0 | |
about 1 month ago | about 1 year ago | |
Common Lisp | C# | |
- | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
named-closure
Posts with mentions or reviews of named-closure.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-02.
-
Scheme vs CL? Differences? Pros and Cons?
More on the "why" section here: https://github.com/BlueFlo0d/named-closure (p.s. the project is just an incomplete attempted solution)
- My solution to introspectable and redefinable closures
Programming-Language-Benchmarks
Posts with mentions or reviews of Programming-Language-Benchmarks.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-02.
-
Scheme vs CL? Differences? Pros and Cons?
SIMD is manic bullet where it is useful. Doing image manipulation where you can manipulate 32 RGB values with a single operation is one of them. Array vectorization is another one and there are zillion other areas where it is difficult to live without it. A lot of times you can realize that when C, C++ is faster than SBCL is because they do auto vectorization. When do the same in SBCL you get he same speed as C++ even with the additional 8-10ms SBCL startup time. Just look at the codes in my repo https://github.com/bpecsek/Programming-Language-Benchmarks/tree/main/bench/algorithm/spectral-norm and do the benchmarks.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing named-closure and Programming-Language-Benchmarks you can also consider the following projects:
om-sharp - OM#: Visual Programming | Computer-assisted Music Compositon
openmusic - The OpenMusic visual programming / computer-aided composition environment
erlt - Early prototype of ErlT, an experimental Erlang dialect with first-class support for static typing.