mummy VS torrentinim

Personally this preciseness is just a distraction, but it sounds like you have learned from the constraints and can now take the training wheels off again.

Very curious about those cases, yet to find one myself that was not because of a bad design decision. Though I am also very big on the idea of `ambiguous grammar, rigorous implementation`, for natural language too. (Toki Pona is a somewhat extreme example but the contextual grammar, and holistic minimalism is fascinating)

Not to make it longer than needs to be; But take the example code in this readme: https://github.com/guzba/mummy

Being able to quickly script this without thinking about cases or style on the first pass is a really lovely way of reducing friction imho.

Added a WebSocket chat example here: https://github.com/guzba/mummy/blob/master/examples/chat.nim

Check out my project Torrentinim for a popular but simple enough project if you want to taste what Nim is like.

https://github.com/sergiotapia/torrentinim

It's easy to understand code.

Would love to try this. You should provide compiled assets for all major platforms. I don't know how to run this on a Windows machine.

Here's an example how I do it for my project: https://github.com/sergiotapia/torrentinim/blob/master/.gith...

And the releases: https://github.com/sergiotapia/torrentinim/releases

That appears to be a work in progress: https://github.com/sergiotapia/torrentinim/issues/2

Nice. If someone is looking for something less resource hungry, have a look at Torrentinim. It is the successor of Magnetissimo.

Nim's elevator pitch is looks like Python so it's easy to read/write, compiles down to C and then to native binaries, and runs so fast it'll make your head explode.

Here's a project I wrote in Nim that even if you've never even seen Nim before you would understand what's going on. https://github.com/sergiotapia/torrentinim