modelfusion VS Filestash

ModelFusion is an AI integration library that I am developing. It enables you to integrate AI models into your JavaScript and TypeScript applications. You can install it with the following command:

ModelFusion is an open-source library I'm developing to integrate AI models seamlessly into TypeScript projects. It provides an Ollama client and a generateStructure function.

ModelFusion: ModelFusion is a library for building multi-modal AI applications that I've been working on. It provides a streamText function that calls AI models and returns a streaming response. ModelFusion also contains an Ollama integration that we will use to access the OpenHermes 2.5 Mistral model.

You can find the complete code for the chatbot here: github/com/lgrammel/modelfusion/examples/pdf-chat-terminal

I’m working on ModelFusion, a TypeScript library for working with AI models (llm, image, etc.)

https://github.com/lgrammel/modelfusion

It is only getting limited traction so I’m wondering if I’m missing something fundamental with the approach that I’m taking.

If you work with JS or TS, check out this alternative that I've been working on:

https://github.com/lgrammel/modelfusion

It lets you stay in full control over the prompts and control flow while make a lot of things easier and more convenient.

The response also contains additional information such as the metadata and the full response. The ModelFusion documentation contains many examples and demo apps.

Filestash — A Dropbox-like file manager that connects to a range of protocols and platforms: S3, FTP, SFTP, Minio, Git, WebDAV, Backblaze, LDAP and more.

I made https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash out of the need to collaborate on org mode documents with non emacs users. Once the first release was done, I got to reflect on the infamous top comment of the Dropbox HN to make an attempt at abstracting the storage aspect of Dropbox so those org document could be made stored on a FTP server, SFTP, S3, ....

> we need an abstraction for just this. "Bring your own storage"

I made exactly this: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash and there's an API from which you can abstract any kind of storage: S3, SFTP, FTP, GIT, WebDav, Samba, Local FS, NFS, Backblaze, Storj, Artifactory, .... There's even some funky ones like Mysql from which you have an abstraction where first level folders are databases, second level folders are tables and files are the actual rows

Yes, I rewrote my react app onto vanilla JS using nothing else than rxjs, didn't have the time to document it all yet but it looks like this: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/blob/master/pub...

I'm not familiar with Cloudreve, but FileStash is a similar application often recommended on this subreddit.

I do use them on my OSS work (https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/tree/master/pub...) which is used by many thousands of people

- [2] current state of the rewrite where you can see this pattern in action https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash-rewrite/tree/ma...

https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash

This is what I wish Dropbox was, a simple layer that make interacting with your FTP server easy so nobody has to own your data. The end game is both to be feature complete with Dropbox and be able to change every aspect of the application through plugin so everyone can get out what they want from it.

> but I don't think its the companies responsibility to give back to open source just because they use it

As someone who does quite a bit of OSS, the reality is most people are asking for things but aren't willing to pay for it. Take Microsoft, I had one of their employee asking me to support their azure stuff: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/issues/180. When I found out the dude was actually employed by Microsoft, he started to talk some nonsense and ended up running away.