micro-plugin-lsp
buildroot
micro-plugin-lsp | buildroot | |
---|---|---|
1 | 7 | |
155 | 727 | |
- | 0.6% | |
5.2 | 0.0 | |
9 days ago | 8 months ago | |
Lua | Makefile | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
micro-plugin-lsp
-
Modeless Vim
It is sad that it is a plugin instead of a core feature and a buggy one at that (https://github.com/AndCake/micro-plugin-lsp), it's the last missing piece to transform a really good choice into the de factor killer
buildroot
-
Modeless Vim
Tesla uses Qt and Qt WebEngine uses Chromium, meaning that there is probably in fact a V8 JavaScript engine in any given Tesla.
https://github.com/teslamotors/buildroot/tree/buildroot-2021...
-
Being both a mechanic and programmer I don’t even know where to begin…
It uses buildroot: - https://github.com/teslamotors/buildroot - https://lists.buildroot.org/pipermail/buildroot/2018-May/221323.html
- Elon Musk's politics trigger strong reactions from Tesla customers
- Is there an iso of tesla's in-car software (MCU) for download?
-
Tesla Locks in the Middle of the Highway
> Its actually the other way around. Tesla cars are designed more like SpaceX rockets or fighter jets in terms of electronics.
Yeah, the SpaceX and Tesla software stacks for their firmware are similar in a lot of ways, they both heavily use buildroot(https://buildroot.org/) for at least a good bit of their Linux based firmware, good luck getting proper GPL source from them though, Tesla last I checked at least made some effort to publish what appears to be incomplete buildroot source code(https://github.com/teslamotors/buildroot).
SpaceX just inaccurately claims "Because we are not distributing buildroot, we are not legally required to distribute the source code under the GPLv2 license." then ignores you even though they very obviously distribute buildroot based firmware to customers as it's used in the Starlink Dishy antenna(I asked for their buildroot source and have a Dishy antenna, that was their response...and to top it off I'm even a major buildroot contributor). They def have a bunch of cool tech but are super secretive about everything it seems, they don't appear to ever upstream patches or interact with outside software developers.
- Tesla was “looking for Linux game developers” : here is a demo of cyberpunk inside Tesla multimedia system
-
The competition is coming
Uh. There are a lot of things you're getting very wrong here. First, Tesla's OS is absolutely Linux. It may not be running the GNU software stack, but that makes it not a GNU/Linux. Though, I'll point out that it's running the Busybox software stack as well as custom software. Please feel free to review the buildroot build system for Tesla's car OS. https://github.com/teslamotors/buildroot
What are some alternatives?
CuteVim - Sensible defaults for Vim
buildroot - Buildroot, making embedded Linux easy. Note that this is not the official repository, but only a mirror. The official Git repository is at http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/. Do not open issues or file pull requests here.
ModelessVim - Configuration files to turn vim into a modeless editor.
linux - Linux sources
blog - My Blog
hydra - make Emacs bindings that stick around