meta-code-verify
dagger
meta-code-verify | dagger | |
---|---|---|
5 | 97 | |
135 | 10,358 | |
1.5% | 3.6% | |
8.6 | 9.9 | |
5 days ago | 5 days ago | |
TypeScript | Go | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
meta-code-verify
-
Code Verify: An open source browser extension for verifying code authenticity
(2022)
https://github.com/facebookincubator/meta-code-verify is the goods, and is MIT
https://github.com/facebookincubator/meta-code-verify#instal... says Safari support is "coming soon" (from 2022) so I guess they think those users don't need to "verify[..] the integrity of a web page."
-
Open Source Hacktivism, Open Source Gains Traction in the Enterprise, and More: Open Source Matters
Code Verify - A browser extension from Meta for verifying the integrity of web pages and detect executed code that’s not included in the site manifest.
-
Security experts declare all Proton apps secure after security audit
> The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads
True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different).
In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers don't natively have a nice way of pinning specific versions of a web app, but there is the clever hack of SecureBookmarks[0] (if you're prepared to sacrifice the UX), or, more realistically, you can pin the web app version using some sort of browser extension.
Examples of the latter include the Signed Pages extension[1], and Code Verify[2], which is the result of a collaboration between Meta and Cloudflare (for securing the WhatsApp Web code, currently, but should eventually support other sites like Proton's too). Of course, it would be much better if this capability was natively included in browsers themselves, but hopefully adoption of this technology will pressure browsers and standards bodies to take ownership of this.
[0] https://coins.github.io/secure-bookmark/
[1] https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages
[2] https://github.com/facebookincubator/meta-code-verify
- Code Verify – MIT extension that confirms that your WhatsApp Web not tampered
dagger
- Dagger: Programmable open source CI/CD engine that runs pipelines in containers
-
Nix is a better Docker image builder than Docker's image builder
The fact that I couldn't point to one page on the docs that shows the tl;dr or the what problem is this solving
https://docs.dagger.io/quickstart/562821/hello just emits "Hello, world!" which is fantastic if you're writing a programming language but less helpful if you're trying to replace a CI/CD pipeline. Then, https://docs.dagger.io/quickstart/292472/arguments doubles down on that fallacy by going whole hog into "if you need printf in your pipline, dagger's got your back". The subsequent pages have a lot of english with little concrete examples of what's being shown.
I summarized my complaint in the linked thread as "less cowsay in the examples" but to be honest there are upteen bazillion GitHub Actions out in the world, not the very least of which your GHA pipelines use some https://github.com/dagger/dagger/blob/v0.10.2/.github/workfl... https://github.com/dagger/dagger/blob/v0.10.2/.github/workfl... so demonstrate to a potential user how they'd run any such pipeline in dagger, locally, or in Jenkins, or whatever by leveraging reusable CI functions that setup go or run trivy
Related to that, I was going to say "try incorporating some of the dagger that builds dagger" but while digging up an example, it seems that dagger doesn't make use of the functions yet <https://github.com/dagger/dagger/tree/v0.10.2/ci#readme> which is made worse by the perpetual reference to them as their internal codename of Zenith. So, even if it's not invoked by CI yet, pointing to a WIP PR or branch or something to give folks who have CI/CD problems in their head something concrete to map into how GHA or GitLabCI or Jenkins or something would go a long way
-
Testcontainers
> GHA has "service containers", but unfortunately the feature is too basic to address real-world use cases: it assumes a container image can just … boot! … and only talk to the code via the network. Real world use cases often require serialized steps between the test & the dependencies, e.g., to create or init database dirs, set up certs, etc.)
My biased recommendation is to write a custom Dagger function, and run it in your GHA workflow. https://dagger.io
If you find me on the Dagger discord, I will gladly write a code snippet summarizing what I have in mind, based on what you explained of your CI stack. We use GHA ourselves and use this pattern to great effect.
Disclaimer: I work there :)
-
BuildKit in depth: Docker's build engine explained
Dagger (https://dagger.io) is a great way to use BuildKit through language SDKs. It's such a better paradigm, I cannot imagine going back.
Dagger is by the same folks that brought us Docker. This is their fresh take on solving the problem of container building and much more. BuildKit can more than build images and Dagger unlocks it for you.
-
Cloud, why so difficult? 🤷♀️
And suddenly, it's almost painfully obvious where all the pain came from. Cloud applications today are simply a patchwork of disconnected pieces. I have a compiler for my infrastructure, another for my functions, another for my containers, another for my CI/CD pipelines. Each one takes its job super seriously, and keeps me safe and happy inside each of these machines, but my application is not running on a single machine anymore, my application is running on the cloud.
-
Share your DevOps setups
That said I've been moving my CI/CD to https://dagger.io/ which has been FANTASTIC. It's code based so you can define all your pipelines in Go, Python, or Javascript and they all run on containers so I can run actions locally without any special setup. Highly recommended.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
You are right make is arcane. But it gets the job done. There are new exciting things happening in this area. Check out https://dagger.io.
-
Shellcheck finds bugs in your shell scripts
> but I'm not convinced it's ready to replace Gitlab CI.
The purpose of Dagger it's not to replace your entire CI (Gitlab in your case). As you can see from our website (https://dagger.io/engine), it works and integrates with all the current CI providers. Where Dagger really shines is to help you and your teams move all the artisanal scripts encoded in YAML into actual code and run them in containers through a fluent SDK which can be written in your language of choice. This unlocks a lot of benefits which are detailed in our docs (https://docs.dagger.io/).
> Dagger has one very big downside IMO: It does not have native integration with Gitlab, so you end up having to use Docker-in-Docker and just running dagger as a job in your pipeline.
This is not correct. Dagger doesn't depend on Docker. We're just conveniently using Docker (and other container runtimes) as it's generally available pretty much everywhere by default as a way to bootstrap the Dagger Engine. You can read more about the Dagger architecture here: https://github.com/dagger/dagger/blob/main/core/docs/d7yxc-o...
As you can see from our docs (https://docs.dagger.io/759201/gitlab-google-cloud/#step-5-cr...), we're leveraging the *default* Gitlab CI `docker` service to bootstrap the engine. There's no `docker-in-docker` happening there.
> It clumps all your previously separated steps into a single step in the Gitlab pipeline.
This is also not the case, we should definitely improve our docs to reflect that. You can organize your dagger pipelines in multiple functions and call them in separate Gitlab jobs as you're currently doing. For example, you can do the following:
```.gitlab-ci.yml
-
Cicada – A FOSS, Cross-Platform Version of GitHub Actions and Gitlab CI
Check out https://dagger.io/. Write declarative pipelines in code, reproducibly run anywhere.
-
Show HN: Togomak – declarative pipeline orchestrator based on HCL and Terraform
Is this similar to Dagger[1] ?
[1] https://dagger.io
What are some alternatives?
FastTreeSHAP - Fast SHAP value computation for interpreting tree-based models
earthly - Super simple build framework with fast, repeatable builds and an instantly familiar syntax – like Dockerfile and Makefile had a baby.
ongdb - ONgDB is an independent fork of Neo4j® Enterprise Edition version 3.4.0.rc02 licensed under AGPLv3 and/or Community Edition licensed under GPLv3
pipeline - A cloud-native Pipeline resource.
xGitGuard - AI based Secrets Detection Python Framework
gitlab-ci-local - Tired of pushing to test your .gitlab-ci.yml?
peacenotwar - Attempts to determine if the computer its running on has an IP originating from Russia or Belarus. If it is then depending on the version of the malware either attempts to delete all files on the computer, or creates a text file on the computers desktop protesting the war in ukraine.
act - Run your GitHub Actions locally 🚀
access-undenied-aws - Access Undenied parses AWS AccessDenied CloudTrail events, explains the reasons for them, and offers actionable remediation steps. Open-sourced by Ermetic.
aws-cdk - The AWS Cloud Development Kit is a framework for defining cloud infrastructure in code
EdenSCM - A Scalable, User-Friendly Source Control System. [Moved to: https://github.com/facebook/sapling]
dagster - An orchestration platform for the development, production, and observation of data assets.