med VS orgmode

Too heavy.

MicroEmacs is small and lightweight. I port it to whatever machine I'm using, and it works nicely in a remote tty window. It doesn't need a customization language, as I just change the source code.

Recently, I added color syntax highlighting to it, and support for unicode characters.

https://github.com/DigitalMars/med

Here's another one with a very small footprint:

https://github.com/DigitalMars/med

It's the one I use every day. The executable on Windows is a little over a meg. It also works on Linux and Mac.

I fixed my editor so that it recognizes URLs, and underlines them. Clicking on one brings up a browser on that site. I should have done that 20 years ago.

No special syntax is required. It just works. I've since been adding URLs in comments all over my code, for references. It's marvelous.

It could be extended to recognize filename.jpg and filename.mp3 to display or play those files, too. Again with no special syntax whatsoever. It just works.

https://github.com/DigitalMars/med

I still use microEmacs, which floated around the intertoobs in the 1980s. Of course, I've modified it substantially over the years, most recently adding color syntax highlighting and Unicode.

D version:

https://github.com/DigitalMars/med

C version:

https://github.com/DigitalMars/me

The "extension language" is it's so easy to just add some code and recompile it, there's no point in adding an extension language.

I like microEmacs a lot because I can use it remotely over a tty interface.

Doing one yourself is fun. MicroEmacs drifted around NNTP in the 80s, and I snagged a copy and began modifying it to taste. I've been using it ever since. The latest version was ported to D:

https://github.com/DigitalMars/med

It's a very easy editor to understand and extend.

nvim-orgmode [1] is also available. Knowledge from emacs orgmode should carry over without much issue. I didn't feel like there was a need to reinvent the wheel like neorg does when there were powerful notetaking solutions available; does anyone have a comparison breakdown of features and capabilities?

[1] https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode

Hi, I'm a nvim user for quite a long time already and I don't think I'd switch to Emacs. However I'm curious if I could use Emacs for orgmode, since I'm not always satisfied by orgmode for neovim (still, kudos to the authors for the amazing work!).

Hello i have trouble to install this plugin:https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode in LazyVim.

But of course. https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode

This might be an issue with our handling of dynamic prefix. I opened an issue here https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode/issues/562 to double check.

I believe the plugin nvim-orgmode is a straight up clone - https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode

Neoorg (ou celui-ci))

I had this issue as well. I’m on Mac and tried all sorts of task managers to address this. Nothing worked until I started using orgmode. I use a limited version on Neovim. Here is the link.

For Notetaking, I use Vimwiki. However there are other out there like obsidian.nvim, telekasten.nvim, neorg, nvim-orgmode, mind.nvim. I wanted something that felt universal, (like supported anywhere) so I moved to basically to markdown based system, since it's supported by github, gitlab, obsidian gui app, etc. I even use it on mobile, there is an obsidian android app.