maxima-jupyter
reduce-algebra
maxima-jupyter | reduce-algebra | |
---|---|---|
1 | 3 | |
180 | 30 | |
- | - | |
4.0 | 9.3 | |
4 months ago | 6 days ago | |
Common Lisp | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
maxima-jupyter
-
Maxima: A computer algebra system written in Common Lisp
An alternative is to run maxima from jupyter: https://github.com/robert-dodier/maxima-jupyter.
reduce-algebra
-
An Apologia of Lazy Evaluation
Usually the arguments are a) it provides runtime access to the source (which for example is useful in R), b) runtime introspection is easier to understand (for the proponents) and c) macros are too static (they want more flexibility at runtime). For example authors of the REDUCE computer algebra system disliked Common Lisp for the lack of FEXPRs and that's why they stayed away from it: https://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.io/ .
> The languages you mention probably
No, see above.
-
Maxima: A computer algebra system written in Common Lisp
Reduce is another lisp based computer algebra system from the prehistoric times, now open sourced.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduce_(computer_algebra_syste...
https://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.io/
I paid money for a Reduce release for RISCOS back in the last ice age. I recollect having to register my licence with the Rand Corporation for some reason.
-
A Modern Fortran Scientific Programming Ecosystem
I idly wonder how these compare to the arbitrary-precision implementations in REDUCE (https://github.com/reduce-algebra/reduce-algebra/blob/master...) - written mostly by me, 30 years ago in the unusual, Lisp-based but largely procedural, language of REDUCE. Can't remember much about the subject now.
The citations in the Julia source file are certainly newer - Abramowitz and Stegun was basically all I had.
I think the REDUCE functions were considered quite fast (for higher precision) at the time, but it was certainly true that they weren't tested as thoroughly as would be the norm now.
What are some alternatives?
maxima-client - Maxima client
symengine - SymEngine is a fast symbolic manipulation library, written in C++
hsluv - Human-friendly HSL, website and math
SIunits - A Scheme function to format physical quantities according to SI conventions in TeXmacs
maxima-interface - Simple interface between Common Lisp and Maxima. Moved to https://git.sr.ht/~jmbr/maxima-interface
Bessels.jl - Bessel functions for real arguments and orders