math-comp VS coq-simple-io

Compare math-comp vs coq-simple-io and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
math-comp coq-simple-io
1 2
548 28
1.3% -
9.1 6.8
12 days ago about 1 month ago
Coq Coq
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

math-comp

Posts with mentions or reviews of math-comp. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-18.

coq-simple-io

Posts with mentions or reviews of coq-simple-io. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-04.
  • Inspiring OOP examples?
    1 project | /r/java | 12 Mar 2023
    My point about a proof assistant language, let's just say Coq, is focused on pure, referentially transparent functions. There are no IORef like escape hatches required to make things work, although you could probably argue that stuff like this is still pure as, there are certainly escape hatches. Generally speaking, in proof assistants, the program can be self-contained, and is thus "pure".
  • Advent of Code Day 1
    3 projects | /r/Coq | 4 Feb 2022
    It's possible to do all that work still in Coq, so that the extracted code can directly be compiled into an executable. One way is to use the coq-simple-io library, which basically wraps the OCaml standard library (including functions for reading and writing files/stdin/stdout) as Coq axioms. For example, I did extraction that way in a previous iteration of AoC: https://github.com/Lysxia/advent-of-coq-2018/blob/master/sol/day01_1.v

What are some alternatives?

When comparing math-comp and coq-simple-io you can also consider the following projects:

regexp-Brzozowski - Coq formalization of decision procedures for regular expression equivalence [maintainer=@anton-trunov]

proofs - My personal repository of formally verified mathematics.

UniMath - This coq library aims to formalize a substantial body of mathematics using the univalent point of view.

advent-of-coq-2018 - Advent of Code 2018, in Coq! (https://adventofcode.com/2018)

analysis - Mathematical Components compliant Analysis Library

CompCert - The CompCert formally-verified C compiler

coq-library-undecidability - A library of mechanised undecidability proofs in the Coq proof assistant.

advent-of-coq-2021

aneris - Program logic for developing and verifying distributed systems

rupicola - Gallina to Bedrock2 compilation toolkit

magmide - A dependently-typed proof language intended to make provably correct bare metal code possible for working software engineers.