mantine VS antd

Panda Mantine

🌐 Mantine Documentation

GitHub: https://github.com/mantinedev/mantine

1. Mantine A fully-featured library of customizable React components and hooks written in TypeScript. Perfect for building high-quality UI effortlessly. Mantine:

Mantine Mantine is a powerful and versatile choice for React developers, offering a rich set of customizable components, modern design features, and excellent support for accessibility and theming. It’s a fantastic option for building modern, responsive, accessible web applications.

styled-component, Emotion, Mantine 등이 있다.

In this article, we will explore how to integrate the Draw.io and MathType with TinyMCE rich text editor for diagram creation, writing mathematical expressions within a React application. For ease, I have used mantine components library. You can check this out on mantine.dev. This integration allows users to create and embed diagrams directly into their content using a seamless workflow.

Mantine is a modern React component library with a focus on accessibility and usability.

It was my first time doing react things. The great Mantine UI (https://mantine.dev/) react library helped a lot.

6. Ant Design

GitHub: https://github.com/ant-design/ant-design

10. Ant Design A comprehensive design system with a wide variety of ready-to-use components, patterns, and themes optimized for enterprise-level applications. Ant Design:

I also decided to choose a component library antd, so I won't have to reinvent the wheel and can prototype at a faster phase.

Ant Design Ant Design is a comprehensive design system and React UI library for enterprise applications. It provides a wide range of high-quality components and an extensive design language.

Let's start by setting up our Next.js project with all the necessary dependencies. We'll use TypeScript for type safety, Tailwind CSS for styling, Ant Design for UI components, Zod for form validation, and Resend for email functionality.

Ant Design is a comprehensive React UI library that offers a wealth of well-designed, high-quality components. It stands out for its consistency, flexibility, and ease of use, making it an ideal choice for modern web applications. By adopting Ant Design, we aimed to:

Ant Design

What's particularly wrong with it? Looks like pretty standard React, with some custom hooks imported, and clearly defined props.

If you start at the bottom, with the actual component (https://github.com/ant-design/ant-design/blob/master/compone...), the logic is much clearer. Most of the other consts are just definitions that you pass to the component (see documentation at https://ant.design/components/table#table).

And for the long list of imports and such, any modern IDE can parse those for you and easily jump to the source or the type defs.

If you're complaining about how this looks vs traditional OOP code, etc., that's just a stylistic choice Meta made for React codebases a few years back. It actually does make components pretty easy to maintain over the long term because all the core logic is just in one long, flat file. Lots of vertical scrolling, but predictable outcomes and easily refactored chunks. But third parties typically just have to mimic that style. That's not on Ant, that's just how JS code is currently in fashion...

I was using a Chinese website recently based on the “ant design” [^1] library / philosophy. It’s a really UI dense way of doing things and I really enjoyed having everything there without having to go hunting into menus.

[1]: https://ant.design/