logging-effect VS hasql-dynamic-statements

Compare logging-effect vs hasql-dynamic-statements and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
logging-effect hasql-dynamic-statements
- 1
57 5
- -
2.1 6.1
about 1 year ago about 1 month ago
Haskell Haskell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

logging-effect

Posts with mentions or reviews of logging-effect. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning logging-effect yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

hasql-dynamic-statements

Posts with mentions or reviews of hasql-dynamic-statements. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-09.
  • Persistent vs. beam for production database
    2 projects | /r/haskell | 9 Feb 2023
    In typical CRUD applications you can get a long way with type-checked plain SQL and tuples via hasql-th, which is a great time saver at prototyping. Later on when you have more conditional logic in your queries you can gradually substitute it with dynamic statements. It works very well in production where you incrementally refine your own high-level abstractions with appropriate encoders/decoders, you can even build your own DSL on top of it, instead of relying on pre-defined query building APIs of Persistent and Beam. But again, both Persistent and Beam will work well too.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing logging-effect and hasql-dynamic-statements you can also consider the following projects:

gotta-go-fast - A command line utility for practicing typing and measuring your WPM and accuracy.

aeson-json-ast - Integration layer for "json-ast" and "aeson"

ble

hworker - A reliable at-least-once job queue built on Redis.

hasql-implicits - Implicit definitions for Hasql, such as default codecs for standard types

type-int - Type level 2's and 16's complement arithmetic (old)

rss - A library for generating RSS 2.0 feeds.

penrose - Haskell to JavaScript compiler, based on GHC

google-oauth2 - Google OAuth2 token negotiation

aeson-serialize - Functions for serializing a type that is an instance of ToJSON

semver-range - Implementation of semver and NPM-style semantic version ranges in Haskell