lit
React
Our great sponsors
lit | React | |
---|---|---|
141 | 1,693 | |
17,535 | 221,803 | |
2.1% | 1.1% | |
9.4 | 9.9 | |
2 days ago | 1 day ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lit
-
I've created yet another JavaScript framework
That is the reason why I experiment with the TiniJS framework for a while. It is a collection of tools for developing web/desktop/mobile apps using the native Web Component technology, based on the Lit library. Thank you the Lit team for creating a great tool assists us working with standard Web Component easier.
- Web Components e a minha opinião sobre o futuro das libs front-end
-
Show HN: I made a Pinterest clone using SigLIP image embeddings
https://github.com/lit/lit/tree/main/packages/labs/virtualiz...
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
actually, looking at it (https://lit.dev/), i do exactly that.
I also define a `render()` and extend my own parent, which does a `replaceChildren()` with the render. And, strangely, I also call the processor `html`
I'll still stick with mine however, my 'framework' is half-page of code. I dislike dependencies greatly. I'd need to be saving thousand+ lines at least.
Here, I don't want a build system to make a website; that's mad. So I don't want lit. I want the 5 lines it takes to invoke a dom parser, and the 5 lines it takes do define a webcomp parent.
-
Web Components Aren't Framework Components
I rather like https://lit.dev/ for web components so far.
For the reactivity stuff, you might want to read https://frontendmasters.com/blog/vanilla-javascript-reactivi... - it shows a bunch of no-library-required patterns that, while in a number of cases I'd much rather use a library myself, all seems at least -basically- reasonable to me and will probably be far more comprehensible to you than whatever I'd reach for, and frameworks are always much more pleasant to approach after you've already done a bunch of stuff by banging rocks together first.
- Reddit just completed their migration out of React
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
I work on Lit, which I would hesitate to call a framework, but gives a framework-like DX for building web components, while trying to keep opinions to a minimum and lock-in as low as possible.
It's got reactivity, declarative templates, great performance, SSR, TypeScript support, native CSS encapsulation, context, tasks, and more.
It's used to build Material Design, settings and devtools UIs for Chrome, some UI for Firefox, Reddit, Photoshop Web...
https://lit.dev if you're interested.
-
HTML Web Components
I am more a fan of the augmented style because it doesn't entrap you in dev lock-in to platforms.
The problem with frameworks, especially web frameworks, is they reimplement many items that are standard now (shadowdom, components, storage, templating, base libraries, class/async, network/realtime etc).
If you like the component style of other frameworks but want to use Web Components, Google Lit is quite nice.
Google Lit is like a combination of HTML Web Components and React/Vue style components. The great part is it is build on Web Components underneath.
[1] https://lit.dev/
-
Web Components Will Outlive Your JavaScript Framework
From the comments I see here, it seems like people expect the Webcomponents API to be a complete replacement for a JS framework. The thing is, our frameworks should start making use of modern web APIs, so the frameworks will have to do less themselves, so can be smaller. Lit [0] for example is doing this. Using Lit is very similar to using React. Some things work different, and you have to get used to some web component specific things, but once you get it, I think it's way more pleasant to work with than React. It feels more natural, native, less framework-specific.
For state management, I created LitState [1], a tiny library (really only 258 lines), which integrates nicely with Lit, and which makes state management between multiple components very easy. It's much easier than the Redux/flux workflows found in React.
So my experience with this is that it's much nicer to work with, and that the libraries are way smaller.
[0] https://lit.dev/
- Lit – a small responsive CSS framework
React
-
React 18.3.0 Is Out
Oddly, no info on changelog: https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
-
Preact vs React: A Comparative Guide
In this post, we get to know more about Preact, one of this year's trending libraries. And we'll compare it to React to see which one suits better for our projects.
-
Meet Cheryl Murphy: Full-Stack Developer, lifelong learner, and volunteer Project Team Lead at Web Dev Path
Cheryl Murphy is not only a dedicated full-stack web developer skilled in technologies like React, Next.js, and NestJs but also a community-driven professional who recently took on the role of volunteer project team lead at Web Dev Path. With a dual Bachelor's degree in Computing and Chemical Engineering from Monash University, Cheryl’s journey in tech is marked by a passion for building accessible solutions and a commitment to fostering community within tech.
-
How to Build an AI FAQ System with Strapi, LangChain & OpenAI
Basic knowledge of ReactJs
-
Everyone Has JavaScript, Right?
Google Translate and many other libraries break React based sites if they are using refs.
I don't think that point it falls under "written on naive assumptions"
https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/11538
the issue says closed but you can easily catch it in various sites and use cases.
-
Integrate Bootstrap with React
This article serves as your comprehensive guide to mastering the art of combining Bootstrap and React seamlessly. Dive in to uncover the tips, tricks, and best practices to elevate your UI design game effortlessly.
-
React Server Components Example with Next.js
This isn’t an accident; when Meta introduced React Server Components, Dan Abramov explicitly stated that they collaborated with the Next.js team to develop the RSC webpack plugin.
-
Collab Lab #66 Recap
JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite
-
New Features in React 19 – Updates with Code Examples
Official Website Team GitHub Canary Releases
- Web Components e a minha opinião sobre o futuro das libs front-end
What are some alternatives?
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
qwik - Instant-loading web apps, without effort
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
Alpine.js - A rugged, minimal framework for composing JavaScript behavior in your markup.
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀
SvelteKit - web development, streamlined
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
lit-element - LEGACY REPO. This repository is for maintenance of the legacy LitElement library. The LitElement base class is now part of the Lit library, which is developed in the lit monorepo.
Preact - ⚛️ Fast 3kB React alternative with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.