lit
daisyui
Our great sponsors
lit | daisyui | |
---|---|---|
141 | 248 | |
17,535 | 30,632 | |
2.1% | - | |
9.4 | 9.8 | |
3 days ago | 7 days ago | |
TypeScript | Svelte | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lit
-
I've created yet another JavaScript framework
That is the reason why I experiment with the TiniJS framework for a while. It is a collection of tools for developing web/desktop/mobile apps using the native Web Component technology, based on the Lit library. Thank you the Lit team for creating a great tool assists us working with standard Web Component easier.
- Web Components e a minha opinião sobre o futuro das libs front-end
-
Show HN: I made a Pinterest clone using SigLIP image embeddings
https://github.com/lit/lit/tree/main/packages/labs/virtualiz...
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
actually, looking at it (https://lit.dev/), i do exactly that.
I also define a `render()` and extend my own parent, which does a `replaceChildren()` with the render. And, strangely, I also call the processor `html`
I'll still stick with mine however, my 'framework' is half-page of code. I dislike dependencies greatly. I'd need to be saving thousand+ lines at least.
Here, I don't want a build system to make a website; that's mad. So I don't want lit. I want the 5 lines it takes to invoke a dom parser, and the 5 lines it takes do define a webcomp parent.
-
Web Components Aren't Framework Components
I rather like https://lit.dev/ for web components so far.
For the reactivity stuff, you might want to read https://frontendmasters.com/blog/vanilla-javascript-reactivi... - it shows a bunch of no-library-required patterns that, while in a number of cases I'd much rather use a library myself, all seems at least -basically- reasonable to me and will probably be far more comprehensible to you than whatever I'd reach for, and frameworks are always much more pleasant to approach after you've already done a bunch of stuff by banging rocks together first.
- Reddit just completed their migration out of React
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
I work on Lit, which I would hesitate to call a framework, but gives a framework-like DX for building web components, while trying to keep opinions to a minimum and lock-in as low as possible.
It's got reactivity, declarative templates, great performance, SSR, TypeScript support, native CSS encapsulation, context, tasks, and more.
It's used to build Material Design, settings and devtools UIs for Chrome, some UI for Firefox, Reddit, Photoshop Web...
https://lit.dev if you're interested.
-
HTML Web Components
I am more a fan of the augmented style because it doesn't entrap you in dev lock-in to platforms.
The problem with frameworks, especially web frameworks, is they reimplement many items that are standard now (shadowdom, components, storage, templating, base libraries, class/async, network/realtime etc).
If you like the component style of other frameworks but want to use Web Components, Google Lit is quite nice.
Google Lit is like a combination of HTML Web Components and React/Vue style components. The great part is it is build on Web Components underneath.
[1] https://lit.dev/
-
Web Components Will Outlive Your JavaScript Framework
From the comments I see here, it seems like people expect the Webcomponents API to be a complete replacement for a JS framework. The thing is, our frameworks should start making use of modern web APIs, so the frameworks will have to do less themselves, so can be smaller. Lit [0] for example is doing this. Using Lit is very similar to using React. Some things work different, and you have to get used to some web component specific things, but once you get it, I think it's way more pleasant to work with than React. It feels more natural, native, less framework-specific.
For state management, I created LitState [1], a tiny library (really only 258 lines), which integrates nicely with Lit, and which makes state management between multiple components very easy. It's much easier than the Redux/flux workflows found in React.
So my experience with this is that it's much nicer to work with, and that the libraries are way smaller.
[0] https://lit.dev/
- Lit – a small responsive CSS framework
daisyui
-
HTML-first, framework-agnostic implementation of shadcn/UI – franken/UI
DaisyUI offers zero-JS components
https://daisyui.com/
I used it for a small form + search result list recently and it works well enough for simple / static stuff.
But I think I'll still be reaching for a JS lib first since I'd miss things like inputs-with-autocomplete too much.
- Show HN: Open Source TailwindCSS UI Components
-
How to use Tailwind with any CSS framework
Tailwind is great, but creating everything from scratch is annoying. A nice base of components which can be extended with tailwind would be great. There are a few tailwind frameworks like Flowbite, Daisy Ui, but I like Bulma, PicoCSS and Bootstrap.
- Ask HN: Freelance website builders/maintainers, what's in your 2024 toolkit?
-
Building a Fast, Efficient Web App: The Technology Stack of PromptSmithy Explained
While I have experience with Tailwind and frontend development, I don’t really have the patience to use it. I usually end up using something like Mantine, which is a complete component library UI kit, or Daisy UI, which is a component library built on top of Tailwind. Shadcn/ui is quite similar to Daisy in this sense, but being able to customize the individual components, since they get installed to your components folder, made development more streamlined and more customizable. On top of that being able to change my components style with natural language thanks to v0 made development super easy and fast. Shadcn may be too minimalist of a style for some, but thanks to all the components being local, you can customize them quickly and easily!
-
The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0
https://daisyui.com is a really great middle ground—you can move as fast as you would in Bulma, then drop down into the weeds with TW if you need it.
-
Tailwind Color Palette Generator
If you're looking for grab and go components, Daisy UI or Flowbite might be more your speed, I've used both with minimal headache.
https://daisyui.com/
-
DaisyUI + Alpine.js + Codehooks.io - the simple web app trio
This guide is tailored for front-end developers looking to explore the smooth integration of DaisyUI's stylish components, Alpine.js's minimalist reactive framework, and the straightforward back-end capabilities of Codehooks.io.
- DaisyUI: The most popular component library for Tailwind CSS
-
Shadcn: Beautifully designed components that you can copy-paste into your apps
Others:
- https://daisyui.com/
What are some alternatives?
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
flowbite - Open-source UI component library and front-end development framework based on Tailwind CSS
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
headlessui - Completely unstyled, fully accessible UI components, designed to integrate beautifully with Tailwind CSS.
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
shadcn/ui - Beautifully designed components that you can copy and paste into your apps. Accessible. Customizable. Open Source.
Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀
Material UI - Ready-to-use foundational React components, free forever. It includes Material UI, which implements Google's Material Design.
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
theme-change - Change CSS theme with toggle, buttons or select using CSS custom properties and localStorage
Preact - ⚛️ Fast 3kB React alternative with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.
fullcalendar - Full-sized drag & drop event calendar in JavaScript