lerna VS rushstack

On Netlify's enterprise tier, approximately 46% of builds are monorepos, with the majority leveraging Nx and Lerna. Recognizing this trend, Netlify has focused on enhancing the setup and deployment experiences for monorepo projects. In particular they worked on an "automatic monorepo detection" feature. When you connect your project to GitHub, Netlify automatically detects if it's part of a monorepo, reads the relevant settings, and pre-configures your project. This eliminates the need for manual setup. This feature also extends to local development via the Netlify CLI.

This is the exact problem monorepos were born to solve. Not only will a monorepo let you share UI components, you'll be able to gradually add shared application logic as well (for instance, do all of your apps have their own logic for connecting to a database? you could roll that into a shared library with a monorepo). There are a lot of tools for accomplishing this in JS, but probably the most popular is lerna, which is built on top of NX (though lots of teams roll their own monorepo in nx without lerna, which IMO is a totally valid option).

To begin, you need to prepare your environment. A few ways to build a React package include tools like Bit, Storybook, Lerna, and TSDX. However, for this tutorial, you will use a zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules called Microbundle.

If so, are you using a monorepo tool like Nx or Lerna? If not, start there and see if it solves your problem.

I mean I don't know what your monorepo looks like, but for example infernojs (actually written with typescript) uses lerna, and lerna seems simpler than typescript references

Tools for publishing, such as Lerna (when using the --conventional-commit flag), follow this convention when incrementing package versions and generating changelog files.

We could improve part of this by using something like Lerna. With the right configuration, Lerna can be really helpful.

It feels dirty to be adding express as a dependency to a react project, but I'm pretty sure TRPC requires all of client and server code to be in the same node.js project, since types are shared. I've read that you can use a tool like Lerna to share types between node projects, but it requires a build step, which would diminish the benefits of TRPC.

For more information, check out the PR

If you're looking to recreate the ease of a monorepo with eslint/prettier, I've used the rushstack eslint patch to ship an eslint package which is almost fully self-contained, not just config, but dependencies as well: https://github.com/microsoft/rushstack/tree/main/eslint/eslint-patch

I highly recommend rushstack. It’s a suite of tools for managing TypeScript monorepos. I use it at work and never want to go back to working without it.

https://rushjs.io/ and https://rushstack.io/

Rush Stack. It’s an opinionated, batteries-included toolset for working with large monorepos. It’s highly extensible and pluggable, and has built-in support for a lot of common tasks. My team uses it at work to support a couple dozen projects and at this point I can’t imagine managing a monorepo without it. It has significant adoption within and support from Microsoft, and monthly public dev meetings with contributors from a number of other companies, so I really don’t think it’s going to disappear any time soon. From what I’ve seen, it’s a very healthy project that’s continuing to grow in support and adoption.

Tools like Lerna, Bazel, Nx, Rush, Turborepo, to name a few. Lerna is probably the grand daddy of all monorepo tools. CRA, Babel, Jest are a few projects that use it. Bazel has been refined and tested for years at Google to build heavy-duty, mission-critical infrastructure, services, and applications. Turborepo is the monorepo for Vercel, the leading platform for frontend frameworks. These tools can help keep your monorepo workspaces fast, understandable and manageable.

I guess I'm not alone wishing that rush uses commit messages for change log generation. It's actually not so difficult (once it's done 😎).

See: ONNX/ONNX Runtime, VSCode, Rush, & countless others

To late to edit or delete my comment above but just to set it straight I just learned that the whole lerna debacle linked above was a nothing-burger aka “fake news”.

https://github.com/microsoft/rushstack/issues/673#issuecomme...

I've also investigated the Rushstack a bit, another monorepo implementation from Microsoft. It works best with pnpm and has many conceptual differences from Lerna. For me the most significant is it doesn't encourage root package.json, and they have their ideas on husky and pre-commit git hooks. Moreover its configs are somehow complicated, should be suitable for LARGE monorepos, in things like even detailed file permissions, I think.