Canopy
Stryker.NET
Canopy | Stryker.NET | |
---|---|---|
4 | 14 | |
502 | 1,721 | |
- | 1.2% | |
0.0 | 9.3 | |
almost 2 years ago | about 9 hours ago | |
F# | C# | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Canopy
-
How should I get started learning testing in Javascript?
You don't necessarily have to test your JavaScript with JavaScript, btw. Its always good to dabble with other stacks, and it'll add an additional bullet point to your resume. I use a package called Canopy to write very simple tests in F#, which is a Microsoft .NET language.
- Ok, il y a des devs ici. Mais est-ce qu'il y a des testeurs ?
-
Help with automatization
I've been using canopy for a year now and it rocks. Took a while to port over from C# to F#, but it's a lot more stable than out of the box Selenium: https://lefthandedgoat.github.io/canopy/
- Ayuda para progresar como dev junior
Stryker.NET
-
Stryker.NET alternatives - Testura.Mutation, visualmutator, fettle, and Faultify
5 projects | 9 Jun 2023
-
Do you guys mock everything in your Unit Tests?
Bogus - For creating fake data Verify - Snapshot testing for .NET MELT - For testing ILogger usage Stryker - Mutation Testing for .NET TestContainers - run docker programmatically in integration tests
-
Scope of unit testing (karma/Jas) Boss wants unreasonable testing?
This is called mutation testing btw.
-
Don't target 100% coverage
Let's try it on our small example using Stryker.
- PhD'ers, what are you working on? What CS topics excite you?
-
Killing mutants to improve your tests
There are tools that do this automatically, stryker[2] is one of them. When you run stryker, it will create many mutant versions of your production code, and run your tests for each mutant (that's how mutations are called in stryker's' documentation) version of the code. If your tests fail then the mutant is killed. If your tests passed, the mutant survived. Let's have a look at the the result of runnning stryker against reffects-store's code:
-
Not sure if popular opinion: Greenfield projects should have 100% test coverage.
Mutation testing is pretty solid. Better than code coverage for sure. Using Stryker personally.
-
Seriously what are they and why does everyone hate them?
A mutation testing tool (like Stryker) runs your unit tests to verify they all pass then makes a small change (mutation) to your code and reruns the tests. At least one test should fail because the modified code should behave differently.
-
Relesed v1.0.0 of my pet javasscript project yesterday after hitting 100% coverage- a gesture detection library
I haven't tried it yet, but last time I researched it, this is the library that looked most promising: https://stryker-mutator.io/
-
Mutation Testing in NodeJS
Website: https://stryker-mutator.io/
What are some alternatives?
Expecto - A smooth testing lib for F#. APIs made for humans! Strong testing methodologies for everyone!
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
SpecFlow - #1 .NET BDD Framework. SpecFlow automates your testing & works with your existing code. Find Bugs before they happen. Behavior Driven Development helps developers, testers, and business representatives to get a better understanding of their collaboration
sharpfuzz - AFL-based fuzz testing for .NET
Xunit.Gherkin.Quick - BDD in .NET Core - using Xunit and Gherkin (compatible with both .NET Core and .NET)
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
MSTest - MSTest framework and adapter
NUnit - NUnit Framework
Bogus - :card_index: A simple fake data generator for C#, F#, and VB.NET. Based on and ported from the famed faker.js.
FsCheck - Random Testing for .NET
should - Should Assertion Library