language-server-protocol-inspector VS language-server-protocol-inspec

Compare language-server-protocol-inspector vs language-server-protocol-inspec and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
language-server-protocol-inspector language-server-protocol-inspec
1 1
150 -
- -
0.9 -
about 3 years ago -
Vue
MIT License -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

language-server-protocol-inspector

Posts with mentions or reviews of language-server-protocol-inspector. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-06-07.
  • CodePerfect 95 – A fast IDE for Go
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Jun 2021
    I wonder if these performance issues apply to all language extensions that rely on a language server (implemented in VSCode or otherwise). From what I understand, since JSON [0] is used over the wire between the editor and the language server process, there's a lot of serialisation/deserialisation overhead.

    Microsoft used to maintain a log inspector [1] which you could use to see the chatter between the server and client, and there was a _lot_ of chatter with a _lot_ of JSON.

    [0] https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/overvie...

    [1] https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol-inspec...

language-server-protocol-inspec

Posts with mentions or reviews of language-server-protocol-inspec. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-06-07.
  • CodePerfect 95 – A fast IDE for Go
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Jun 2021
    I wonder if these performance issues apply to all language extensions that rely on a language server (implemented in VSCode or otherwise). From what I understand, since JSON [0] is used over the wire between the editor and the language server process, there's a lot of serialisation/deserialisation overhead.

    Microsoft used to maintain a log inspector [1] which you could use to see the chatter between the server and client, and there was a _lot_ of chatter with a _lot_ of JSON.

    [0] https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/overvie...

    [1] https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol-inspec...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing language-server-protocol-inspector and language-server-protocol-inspec you can also consider the following projects:

lintplus - An improved linting plugin for the lite text editor.

imgui - Dear ImGui: Bloat-free Graphical User interface for C++ with minimal dependencies

lite - A lightweight text editor written in Lua

LiteIDE - LiteIDE is a simple, open source, cross-platform Go IDE.