JupyterLab VS core

Does this allow to run a long running task in the background so that a user can close & reopen the tab and continue seeing all the output that has been produced thus far?

This is currently being worked on in Jupyter: https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/pull/15448

This is a problem with codemirror 6. You can upvote https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/issues/14589 and help by contributing (or sponsor someone to do so)

https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/issues/12422

That whole issue feels so stupid.

I quite enjoy jupyter lab otherwise, even if a lot of it is brittle and annoying.

Could you add your details to https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/issues/14625 it seems like a browser specific kssue

This will be possible in JupyterLab 4.0 and Jupyter Notebook 7 to be released in Q2/Q3 this year, see https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/pull/13285

The posted SO is irrelevant. The true answer is that a new dependency included in 3.6 did not have binaries for some platforms. These were now uploaded so after refreshin pip cache you should be good to go. If it still does not work please post details in https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/issues/13920

After a quick look I found the same issue here.

Yes, Jupyter notebook has used CodeMirror for nearly a decade. The official Jupyter notebook has never used Monaco, but the Google version (colab) uses Monaco in order to very nicely leverage LSP support (similar to VS Code). There is preliminary work under way right now to switch from CodeMirror 5 to CodeMirror 6 in the official Jupyter project, but that's going to be significant work (see https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/pull/11638).

It doesn't seem like there is much overlap between Replit and Jupyter notebooks right now, as far as I can tell...

With the support of a team member with prior experience auditing for accessibility, we pinpointed specific ways in which JupyterLab lacked support for accessibility broken up by WCAG 2.1 standards.

Additionally, thank you to all our community launch partners across the frontend ecosystem for helping us bring Storybook 8 to the world! Thanks to Chromatic, Figma, ViteConf, Omlet, DivRiots, story.to.design, StackBlitz, UXpin, Nx, Mock Service Worker, Anima, Zeplin, zeroheight, kickstartDS, and Kendo UI.

Replit is the category leader here, but other products in this space include: Glitch, Codesphere, StackBlitz. Coherence fits here as well, with our “Workspaces” Cloud IDE. We’re also the only option where the PaaS is replaced by an Internal Developer Platform.

"TypeScript Swagger Editor" is a web-based TypeScript editor (of StackBlitz) for Swagger API specifications, with SDK (Software Development Kit) library generated by nestia. It generates SDK types, functions and mockup simulator by analyzing content of the input swagger.json file.

Instantly deploy sites with Firebase hosting and integrate seamlessly with GitHub repos. Stackblitz

Use online code editors such as Codesandbox or Stackblitz. They let you focus on writing code rather than dealing with local environment complexities.

Editor de código Stackblitz

I've started learning React and was using stackblitz.com. which is good but I got into some limitations like not being able to upload my own images.

For a few years I have been aware of on-line development environments such as JSBin, JSFiddle and CodePen. They have spearheaded on-line development and more recently a new breed of on-line resources have become available including CodeSandbox, Stackblitz and Replit. You can even access your GitHub repos directly through an in-browser (web) version of MS Visual Studio Code by pressing the full-stop (try it in one of your own repos). Of course there are also cloud offerings from Amazon, Google, Microsoft, etc. but they require a little more configuration and setup than I was happy to incur. Finally, there are two relatively new offerings in this space in the form of GitPod and GitHub Codespaces. I have signed up but not yet explored what they have to offer.