jnumpy VS stl-benchmark

Compare jnumpy vs stl-benchmark and see what are their differences.

jnumpy

Writing Python C extensions in Julia within 5 minutes. (by Suzhou-Tongyuan)

stl-benchmark

STL benchmark comparing C++ and Julia ⏱ (by aaronang)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
jnumpy stl-benchmark
9 1
227 6
0.9% -
3.9 0.0
11 days ago over 1 year ago
Julia C++
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

jnumpy

Posts with mentions or reviews of jnumpy. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-29.

stl-benchmark

Posts with mentions or reviews of stl-benchmark. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-09.
  • JNumPy: Writing high-performance C extensions for Python in minutes
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Aug 2022
    Some of these are just safety-by-default things. For example, IO in Julia is thread-safe by default, which I think is a good idea because safety-first programming is good for say throwing `print` into a threaded loop written in the REPL. Here for example, https://github.com/aaronang/stl-benchmark/pull/3, was a case where Julia saw a performance hit from C++ and I was curious and tracked it down to this locking-by-default behavior. I'm not sure of a better way of handling it: the C/C++ behavior of not locking by default would make doing things correctly simply would be very hard to use (and is very hard in those languages).

    Though I agree parsers haven't gotten much love in Julia. That said, this repo is saying it's for implementing NumPy extensions, and I don't think NumPy has many parsers it's using.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jnumpy and stl-benchmark you can also consider the following projects:

makepackage - Package for easy packaging of Python code

ideas

poly-match - Source for the "Making Python 100x faster with less than 100 lines of Rust" blog post

PythonCall.jl - Python and Julia in harmony.

log-booster - An VS code extension to quickly add frequently used log statements

Schemathesis - Automate your API Testing: catch crashes, validate specs, and save time

PackageCompiler.jl - Compile your Julia Package

numexpr - Fast numerical array expression evaluator for Python, NumPy, Pandas, PyTables and more

scalene - Scalene: a high-performance, high-precision CPU, GPU, and memory profiler for Python with AI-powered optimization proposals

truffleruby - A high performance implementation of the Ruby programming language, built on GraalVM.

jsmpeg - MPEG1 Video Decoder in JavaScript