jmurmel VS rockstar

See also format.lisp for what I have so far. This will also run with sbcl and/ or abcl. If you've made it this far I'd also appreciate feedback on whether my chosen subset (see the comment at the top of the file) of Common-Lisp's format is somewhat useful and/ or which features you would miss the most.

JMurmel also has commandline flags to turn off language features for experimentation purposes, see e.g. implementing cons, car and cdr in Lambda Calculus.

To my defense, I have started my Lisp compiler/ interpreter mostly for recreational purposes to do the exact opposite of what the checkstyle nazis at my $job demand.

Murmel:

I may be a little late to the party but here's my Murmel solution:

Code is on Github, the latest release with a precompiled jar is at Release V 1.3.

Re: automated tests; there are JUnit tests in https://github.com/mayerrobert/jmurmel/tree/master/lambda/src/test/java, and the files in https://github.com/mayerrobert/jmurmel/tree/master/lambda/src/test/lisp are run automatically, too, and their output and result is checked. Maybe I should add a file HACKING.md or something that gives an intro of the project structure and build system?

All Rockstar programs should be published like this!

https://codewithrockstar.com/

what about using https://codewithrockstar.com/

You see that less these days now that it's an actual programming language

More people should learn Rockstar and apply to these jobs

Unless they want you to program in the programming language called rockstar, or sing as an actual rockstar, or sing programs in rockstar as a rockstar

i prefer Rockstar

The Rockstar programming language was created to stop clueless companies from posting asking for "Rockstar coders" since, now that a language called Rockstar exists, they would be getting responses for something they didn't want.

Then Dylan Beattie created the Rockstar programming language so he could call himself a rockstar programmer.