Apache JMeter VS ffuf

Usually, I would let organic users be my load test. However, I am working on a project that has an anticipated load on a new-to-my-team stack, so I'm looking into ways to load test.

I've seen tools like k6 (https://k6.io/), Artillery (https://www.artillery.io), and JMeter (https://jmeter.apache.org/).

I've been using Artillery, but it's hard to visualize the results.

What do you use?

Apache JMeter: This tool is an open-source application built on Java, designed specifically to test load functionality and performance. Developed by the Apache Software Foundation, JMeter is versatile, able to simulate loads across a wide range of services and protocols such as HTTP, HTTPS, JDBC, LDAP, and SOAP. With an extensible core that can be tailored with plugins, it provides the flexibility needed for different testing scenarios. Its intuitive GUI makes it easy for testers to design test plans and visualize the results in various ways.

I'll use Apache JMeter to do this experiment:

Thanks for the tip. Hows that compare to this tool? https://jmeter.apache.org/

Apache JMeter: Download and install JMeter from the official website (https://jmeter.apache.org/). Java Development Kit (JDK): JMeter requires Java, so ensure you have the latest JDK installed on your system. Postman: Install Postman from the official website (https://www.postman.com/downloads/).

The test scenario consists of querying for descriptions of different offers. During the test, I will collect data on memory and GC parameters using jConsole. I will run the test scenario using jMeter, which additionally will allow me to measure response times.

FYI some of our people internally use Jmeter. https://jmeter.apache.org/

It's not flashy so it probably wont get the standard "we are going to milk you for data" plan

Issue #5682Pull request #717 - Open Model Thread Group: avoid skipping rows from CSV Data Set Config

Performance and load testing are essential parts of GraphQL API testing. It ensures APIs can handle expected traffic volumes and respond within acceptable timeframes. You can use tools like Apache JMeter or Gatling to generate realistic loads and evaluate the API's performance under different scenarios. Techniques like batched queries and caching can help mitigate this issue.

JMeter https://jmeter.apache.org

It seems to me like "fuzzing" has a different meaning in web application penetration testing. Here, "fuzzer" is a term for tools that just generate different request using wordlists, without adding any mutations. For example, the two popular web fuzzers ffuf [1] and wfuzz [2] also call themselves fuzzers.

I see how reusing a term for a different concept is bothersome, but I feel like "fuzzer" is the term that people learning about bug bounty hunting are familiar with.

[1] https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf

[2] https://wfuzz.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

FFUF

I've been using ffuf happily for the past couple of years however I remember seeing a post on reddit/twitter about a new "intelligent" discovery tool.

Learn more about ffuf here: https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf

Also, I see you mentioned using curl. You can checkout ffuf which is closely related but more geared towards what you're doing.

git clone https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf ; cd ffuf ; go get ; go build

So ffuf (https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf) or wfuzz (https://github.com/xmendez/wfuzz) are a better choice to enumerate GET/POST parameters/values.