JITWatch
SharpLab
JITWatch | SharpLab | |
---|---|---|
10 | 106 | |
3,015 | 2,560 | |
0.6% | - | |
6.3 | 7.8 | |
about 1 month ago | 4 months ago | |
Java | C# | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
JITWatch
-
It's 2023, so of course I'm learning Common Lisp
You can kind of do the same as DISASSEMBLE in Clojure.
There are some helper projects like https://github.com/Bronsa/tools.decompiler, and on the OpenJDK JitWatch (https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch), other JVMs have similar tools as well.
It isn't as straightforward as in Lisp, but it is nonetheless doable.
-
How much is too much? 380+ lines of an AssertionUtil class Or Loggin classes in general.
As you have encapsulated the asserts inside methods, these will be called at runtime with the arguments evaluated (for example, creating that lambda). When assertions are disabled, the C1/C2 may inline the empty method call eventually, but I don't know whether it drops the lambda instantiation as well. You can use JITWatch to see what gets inlined. The general notion though is to not worry too much. Lazy log messages are a common pattern.
-
JIT x86 ia32
You can use jitwatch for this. To see the actual assembly code generated you will also need to use a debug build of the jvm.
-
SIMD accelerated sorting in Java – how it works and why it was 3x faster
If you use Oracle's own IDE, it will support it out of the box, as it already did on Sun's days.
Then there are other ways depending on which JVM implementation is used.
On OpenJDK's case you can load runtime plugin to do it
https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch
- Equivalent of cppinsight for kotlin
-
Compiler Explorer - Java support
We use https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch for this.
- How to Read Assembly Language
-
Why Zig When There Is Already C++ and Rust?
If you already know any JVM or .NET language, the first step would be to understand the full stack, you don't need C for that.
Many of us were doing systems programming with other languages before C went mainstream.
What you need to learn is computer architecture.
Getting back to JVM or .NET, you can get hold of JIT Watch, VS debug mode or play online in SharpLab.
Get to understand how some code gets translated into MSIL/JVM, and how those bytecodes end up being converted into machine code.
https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch/wiki/Screenshots
https://sharplab.io/
Languages like F# and C# allow you to leave the high level comfort and also do most of the stuff you would be doing in C.
Or just pick D, which provides the same comfort and goes even further in low level capabilities.
Use them to write a toy compiler, userspace driver, talking to GPIO pins in a PI, manipulating B-Tree data stuctures directly from inodes, a TCP/IP userspace driver.
Not advocating not to learn Zig, do it still, the more languages one learns the better.
Only advocating what might be an easier transition path into learning about systems programming concepts.
-
JIT 101
You can enable a lot of debug information about how the compiler decides what to do with your code using feature flags like -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+PrintInlining. If you want to dive deeper into the world of the Hotspot JIT Compiler, have a look at JITWatch.
-
Is Java As Fast As C When It Comes To Stack
In what concerns HotSpot, one way would be JITWatch.
SharpLab
-
Is .NET just miles ahead or am I delusional?
Do these all compile to the exact same thing?
https://sharplab.io/#v2:CYLg1APgAgTAjAWAFBQMwAJboMLoN7LpHoCW...
Yes, so you are right.
-
Generating C# code programmatically
Recently, while creating some experimental C# source code generators (xafero/csharp-generators), I was just concatenating strings together. Like you do, you know, if things have to go very quickly. If you have a simple use case, use a formatted multi-line string or some template library like scriban. But I searched for a way to generate more and more complicated logic easily - like for example, adding raw SQL handler methods to my pre-generated DBSet-like classes for my ADO.NET experiment. You could now say: Use Roslyn and that's really fine if you look everything up in a website like SharpLab, which shows immediately the syntax tree of our C# code.
-
The One Billion Row Challenge – .NET Edition
One results in MOVSX, the other in MOVZX [1]. The difference thus is sign/zero extension when moving to the larger register. However, they seem to perform pretty much identical if I'm reading Agner Fog's instruction tables correctly.
[1] https://sharplab.io/#v2:C4LghgzgtgPgAgJgIwFgBQcDMACR2DC2A3ut...
-
Any programs or websites to practice programming?
If you don't have an IDE, you can use SharpLab.io or dotnet fiddle
- Por debaixo do capô: async/await e as mágicas do compilador csharp
-
C# Testing Playgrounds for old versions?
The closest online tool I can think of would be SharpLab, but you can only choose between Roslyn's git branches instead of C# versions.
- The combined power of F# and C#
-
TypeScript 5.2's New Keyword: 'using'
Your code is destructuring two properties and discarding one of them. It doesn't work with a single property: https://sharplab.io/#v2:C4LgTgrgdgNAJiA1AHwAICYAMBYAUBgRj2Nw...
I think that records don't generate a deconstruct method when they only have one property, but even if you manually define one you'll get an error on `var (varName) = ...`
-
Tips for entry-level .net developer?
- LinqPad is great and I love, but, IMO, it is not the best tool to start with. It does not provide intellisense or debugger in the free version. Assuming you do not want to pay for this licence just to play a little with the language, I'd suggest https://sharplab.io/. It is not as powerfull as LinqPad, but at least it gives you suggestions.
- Running a XUnit test with C#?
What are some alternatives?
JMH - "Trust no one, bench everything." - sbt plugin for JMH (Java Microbenchmark Harness)
Roslyn - The Roslyn .NET compiler provides C# and Visual Basic languages with rich code analysis APIs.
Sniffy - Sniffy - interactive profiler, testing and chaos engineering tool for Java
.NET Runtime - .NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.
jHiccup - jHiccup is a non-intrusive instrumentation tool that logs and records platform "hiccups" - including the JVM stalls that often happen when Java applications are executed and/or any OS or hardware platform noise that may cause the running application to not be continuously runnable.
BenchmarkDotNet - Powerful .NET library for benchmarking
LatencyUtils - Utilities for latency measurement and reporting
interactive - .NET Interactive combines the power of .NET with many other languages to create notebooks, REPLs, and embedded coding experiences. Share code, explore data, write, and learn across your apps in ways you couldn't before.
quickperf - QuickPerf is a testing library for Java to quickly evaluate and improve some performance-related properties
csharplang - The official repo for the design of the C# programming language
honest-profiler - A sampling JVM profiler without the safepoint sample bias
ASP.NET Core - ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.