iter-ops
ramda
iter-ops | ramda | |
---|---|---|
21 | 80 | |
127 | 23,584 | |
- | 0.2% | |
6.2 | 6.8 | |
9 months ago | 4 days ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
iter-ops
-
Updates from the 93rd TC39 meeting
I think I'm gonna stick with iter-ops, where I can use map without Promise resolution, so I can execute any resolution strategy described there.
-
Overboard with iterable operators
So Iβve branched away from iter-ops, and into iter-ops-extras, coding away with no strings attached.
- [Library] - Iterables
-
LINQ, Java Stream API like library for Javascript / Typescript
Is there a good reason to choose this solution over rxjs or iter-ops?
-
Performance measurement for iterable processing
That's why I went an extra mile within iter-ops to provide such performance monitoring tools as pre-defined operators:
-
[AskJS] Is There Some Way to Lazy Evaluate Arrays in JavaScript?
Someone posted this recently. Maybe it'll help?
-
How to update a NodeJS TypeScript library for ESM-compliance?
P.S. I started within the esm branch there, but didn't make much progress. In case you want to re-use that branch ;)
-
Fastest library for processing iterables
Check out Aggregates, it explains why things like groupBy or sort aren't there.
- High-Performance Iterable Library
-
-π- 2021 Day 15 Solutions -π-
JS supports functional programming very well, but I do miss a more native way of processing Iterators without adding a lib like iter-ops, since it is clunky (and a most likely a performance killer) converting Sets and Maps into Arrays back and forth.
ramda
-
Tacit Programming
JavaScript is great for point-free programming! Make sure you check out Ramda.js https://ramdajs.com/
Itβs fun in the sense that solving a puzzle is fun, but I avoid it for anything I need to maintain long-term.
But itβs good practice for understanding combinators which is useful for some kinds of problems.
-
Pipeline-Oriented Programming [video]
This is very cool. I remember I got sucked into things like Ramda going down this functional programming rabbit hole :-)
https://ramdajs.com/
-
Level up your Typescript game, functionally - Part 2
To create our pipeline, I'm going to use the pipe function from the NodeJS ramda library instead of building my own.
-
Level up your Typescript game, functionally - Part 3
Other libraries to check out are pratica and ramda
- Ramda: A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers
-
FP and JavaScript/TypeScript
I recently took ownership of the new types/ramda repo. This repo is re-exported by @types/ramda and is the first step to bringing type definitions for ramda in-house. We're already hard at work correcting major issues, adding full currying support, and general bug fixes
- [AskJS] Auto-Generated Documentation from JSDoc comments, nice modern themes?
-
When to use currying in JavaScript
I'm going to be honest. You probably don't need to use currying in JavaScript. In fact, trying to fit it in your code is going to do more harm than good, unless it's just for fun. Currying only becomes useful when you fully embrace functional programming, which, in JavaScript, means using a library like Ramda instead of the standard built-in functions.
-
No Lodash
Lodash gets so many things wrong Iβd rather not see it in most projects. I appreciate a good utility library for JS projects but my go-to choice has to be Ramda[1]. Every function it exports is curried and works great with pipe which enables me to write highly reusable and composable functions in pointfree notation. I have never been as productive with lodash, and I find the functional style easier to read
[1] https://ramdajs.com/
-
Snap.js - A competitor to Lodash
Do note though that ramda is different from rambda. π (Granted they are very similar!)
What are some alternatives?
Quasar Framework - Quasar Framework - Build high-performance VueJS user interfaces in record time
lodash - A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras.
quill - Quill is a modern WYSIWYG editor built for compatibility and extensibility.
Rambda - Faster and smaller alternative to Ramda
Draft.js - A React framework for building text editors.
RxJS
Editor.js - A block-style editor with clean JSON output
immutable-js - Immutable persistent data collections for Javascript which increase efficiency and simplicity.
CodeMirror - In-browser code editor (version 5, legacy)
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
TOAST UI Editor - ππ Markdown WYSIWYG Editor. GFM Standard + Chart & UML Extensible.
lazy.js - Like Underscore, but lazier