Inbox Zero VS pgmq

On April 1st 2004, Google released Gmail.

Twenty years later, I'm releasing an open source email app that helps you reach inbox zero for a single day: Simple Email Mode

Simple Mode makes handling less overwhelming:

* Handle emails in batches of 5

* Long emails summarized

* Timer to gamify maintain focus

* Set aside what you want to handle later. Archive the rest

You can try it out at https://getinboxzero.com under the Early Access tab.

And check out the GitHub repo: https://github.com/elie222/inbox-zero

Only for Gmail users at this time.

You can also see when we deploy each time on GitHub: https://github.com/elie222/inbox-zero/deployments

And lots of interesting extensions use it, like

https://github.com/tembo-io/pgmq

https://github.com/zombodb/zombodb

https://github.com/supabase/pg_jsonschema

Have you considered https://github.com/tembo-io/pgmq for the queue bit?

some notes about pgmq, https://github.com/tembo-io/pgmq, that is on this list. It is built as an extension in Postgres, which makes it compatible with all languages that have a Postgres driver.

There's no 'magic' to it, it uses existing Postgres features so all the performance and consistency guarantees of Postgres are to be expected. Easily gets to 10k+ concurrent reads and writes even on smaller sized Postgres instances, which is more than most applications need.

Newer project but there's no library needed. https://github.com/tembo-io/pgmq. They have a pretty simple SQL api similar to SQS. It's an extension though, so some cloud provider will not support it.

PGMQ does not require a client library, https://github.com/tembo-io/pgmq so long as your language of choice can run SQL. All the functions live in Postgres, and you just call them with SQL statement. Very similar feel and semantics to SQS.