http-response-decoder VS hasql-dynamic-statements

Compare http-response-decoder vs hasql-dynamic-statements and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
http-response-decoder hasql-dynamic-statements
- 1
1 5
- -
0.0 6.1
over 7 years ago about 1 month ago
Haskell Haskell
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

http-response-decoder

Posts with mentions or reviews of http-response-decoder. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning http-response-decoder yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

hasql-dynamic-statements

Posts with mentions or reviews of hasql-dynamic-statements. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-09.
  • Persistent vs. beam for production database
    2 projects | /r/haskell | 9 Feb 2023
    In typical CRUD applications you can get a long way with type-checked plain SQL and tuples via hasql-th, which is a great time saver at prototyping. Later on when you have more conditional logic in your queries you can gradually substitute it with dynamic statements. It works very well in production where you incrementally refine your own high-level abstractions with appropriate encoders/decoders, you can even build your own DSL on top of it, instead of relying on pre-defined query building APIs of Persistent and Beam. But again, both Persistent and Beam will work well too.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing http-response-decoder and hasql-dynamic-statements you can also consider the following projects:

argon2 - Haskell bindings to libargon2 - the reference implementation of the Argon2 password-hashing function

logging-effect - A very general logging effect for Haskell

persistent-database-url

aeson-json-ast - Integration layer for "json-ast" and "aeson"

average - Provides a (fake) monoid for calculating arithmetic means.

hworker - A reliable at-least-once job queue built on Redis.

containers-unicode-symbols - Unicode alternatives for common functions and operators

hasql-implicits - Implicit definitions for Hasql, such as default codecs for standard types

SDL2-ttf

rss - A library for generating RSS 2.0 feeds.

google-oauth2 - Google OAuth2 token negotiation