honkit VS github-sponsor-report

Azu created 500+ npm packages, wrote and maintains a number of popular command line tools for JavaScript. textlint has 2,751 stars, Secretlint has 698 stars. honkit for building books has 2,896 stars.

Since I see a few people in these comments mourning the general dive that gitbook has taken over the last few years, you might like this, an actively-maintained fork of gitbook as it was before it got bad:

https://github.com/honkit/honkit

Not sure if it's possible inside obsidian but there are other tools out there to create books from different markdown files, like https://github.com/honkit/honkit for example

I'm currently waiting for calibre to install so I can try with honkit instead

Continuously committed repositories include JSer.info, textlint, and JavaScript Primer, etc. On the other hand, the newly created ones after the launch of GitHub Sponsors include philan.net, HonKit, Secretlint, etc.

I look at the source code, it is using https://github.com/honkit/honkit to build

azu/github-sponsor-report: GitHub Sponsors report generator

📝 The report image used here is created with a tool called github-sponsor-report. This report does not include data from people who quit in the middle of the report, so the actual number should be higher or lower. So, please take a look at it for the atmosphere.