prefork VS executable-hash

Compare prefork vs executable-hash and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
prefork executable-hash
- -
6 4
- -
0.0 0.0
over 9 years ago about 5 years ago
Haskell Haskell
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

prefork

Posts with mentions or reviews of prefork. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning prefork yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

executable-hash

Posts with mentions or reviews of executable-hash. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning executable-hash yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing prefork and executable-hash you can also consider the following projects:

async-pool

lxc - High level Haskell bindings to LXC (Linux containers).

monky - The main repository for monky

servant-ekg

optparse-generic - Auto-generate a command-line parser for your datatype

optparse-applicative - Applicative option parser

terminal-progress-bar

optparse-declarative - Declarative command-line option parser

echo - A cross-platform, cross-console way to handle echoing terminal input

turtle - Shell programming, Haskell style

angel - Process Monitoring/Management, Like Daemontools