grpc-proto
gRPC
grpc-proto | gRPC | |
---|---|---|
1 | 202 | |
237 | 40,863 | |
2.5% | 0.8% | |
6.6 | 9.9 | |
21 days ago | 5 days ago | |
Starlark | C++ | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
grpc-proto
-
gRPC Name Resolution & Load Balancing on Kubernetes: Everything you need to know (and probably a bit more)
The State which was returned by the name resolver in the previous steps contains both a list of endpoints and a configuration called ServiceConfig. One of the main use cases of the ServiceConfig is to decide which load balancing policy to go for (e.g. round_robin). ServiceConfig is based on a proto message but the name resolver returns it in JSON form. Let’s look at an example ServiceConfig:
gRPC
-
Golang: out-of-box backpressure handling with gRPC, proven by a Grafana dashboard
gRPC, built on HTTP/2, inherently supports flow control. The server can push updates, but it must also respect flow control signals from the client, ensuring that it doesn't send data faster than what the client can handle.
-
Reverse Engineering Protobuf Definitions from Compiled Binaries
Yes, grpc_cli tool uses essentially the same mechanism except implemented as a grpc service rather than as a stubby service. The basic principle of both is implementing the C++ proto library's DescriptorDatabase interface with cached recursive queries of (usually) the server's compiled in FileDescriptorProtos.
See also https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/doc/server-reflecti...
The primary difference between what grpc does and what stubby does is that grpc uses a stream to ensure that the reflection requests all go to the same server to avoid incompatible version skew and duplicate proto transmissions. With that said, in practice version skew is rarely a problem for grpc_cli style "issue a single RPC" usecases: even if requests do go to two or more different versions of a binary that might have incompatible proto graphs, it is very common for the request and response and RPC to all be in the same proto file so you only need to make one RPC in the first place unless you're using an extension mechanism like proto2 extensions or google.protobuf.Any.
-
Delving Deeper: Enriching Microservices with Golang with CloudWeGo
While gRPC and Apache Thrift have served the microservice architecture well, CloudWeGo's advanced features and performance metrics set it apart as a promising open source solution for the future.
-
gRPC Name Resolution & Load Balancing on Kubernetes: Everything you need to know (and probably a bit more)
The loadBalancingConfig is what we use in order to decide which policy to go for (round_robin in this case). This JSON representation is based on a protobuf message, then why does the name resolver returns it in the JSON format? The main reason is that loadBalancingConfig is a oneof field inside the proto message and so it can not contain values unknown to the gRPC if used in the proto format. The JSON representation does not have this requirement so we can use a custom loadBalancingConfig .
-
Dart on the Server: Exploring Server-Side Dart Technologies in 2024
The Dart implementation of gRPC which puts mobile and HTTP/2 first. It's built and maintained by the Dart team. gRPC is a high-performance RPC (remote procedure call) framework that is optimized for efficient data transfer.
- Usando Spring Boot RestClient
-
How to Build & Deploy Scalable Microservices with NodeJS, TypeScript and Docker || A Comprehesive Guide
gRPC is a high-performance, open-source RPC (Remote Procedure Call) framework initially developed by Google. It uses Protocol Buffers for serialization and supports bidirectional streaming.
-
Actual SSH over HTTPS
In general, tunneling through HTTP2 turns out to be a great choice. There is a RPC protocol built on top of HTTP2: gRPC[1].
This is because HTTP2 is great at exploiting a TCP connection to transmit and receive multiple data structures concurrently - multiplexing.
There may not be a reason to use HTTP3 however, as QUIC already provides multiplexing.
I expect that in the future most communications will be over encrypted HTTP2 and QUIC simply because middleware creators can not resist to discriminate.
[1] <https://grpc.io>
-
Why gRPC is not natively supported by Browsers
Even in the https://grpc.io blog says this
-
SGSG (Svelte + Go + SQLite + gRPC) - open source application
gRPC
What are some alternatives?
grpc-go - The Go language implementation of gRPC. HTTP/2 based RPC
ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ core engine in C++, implements ZMTP/3.1
grpc-kuber-load-balancing - gRPC Name Resolution and Load Balancing on Kubernetes
Apache Thrift - Apache Thrift
Cap'n Proto - Cap'n Proto serialization/RPC system - core tools and C++ library
zeroRPC - zerorpc for python
rpclib - rpclib is a modern C++ msgpack-RPC server and client library
nanomsg - nanomsg library
RPyC - RPyC (Remote Python Call) - A transparent and symmetric RPC library for python
asio-grpc - Asynchronous gRPC with Asio/unified executors
bloomrpc - Former GUI client for gRPC services. No longer maintained.
Nameko - Python framework for building microservices