group-tokenization
By 0353F40E
pmv3
(Withdrawn) A version 3 transaction format proposal for Bitcoin Cash. Maintainer recommends CashTokens: (by bitjson)
group-tokenization | pmv3 | |
---|---|---|
30 | 19 | |
- | 13 | |
- | - | |
- | 2.6 | |
- | about 2 years ago | |
- | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
group-tokenization
Posts with mentions or reviews of group-tokenization.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-17.
-
Bitcoin Maxi AMA
I think BCH has potential to bring me way more than x2 x3 BTC can, which is why my BCH bags are bigger and I'm working hard on actually doing something to help move the needle. I expect the gains from BCH to be worth all my time and energy spent on this. BCH is also an instance of Bitcoin, the invention, one that may live up to the P2P potential, but as we have seen in 2017, that's not been enough to claim THE "Bitcoin" title, not as the invention, but a particular implementation of the invention that got the most market cap. Nothing is forever, and success of one doesn't preclude success of the other. If we grow big, the name won't matter. I like cash, and when I say cash I mean Bitcoin Cash :) Anyway, both blockchains are viable, they exist, they are used in one way or another, and compete with all the other blockchains to take the market cap.
-
Who remembers colored coins?
I took over Andrew Stone's work and have been working on Group Tokens for about a year now, and then Jason joined in and now we're gonna push this together!
-
Celebrating Permissionless Development (Two CHIPs, One Tech)
Thanks to everyone who's interacted with me since then I learned A LOT, and had my mind changed many times, in a good way, about what Group needs to be, not whether it's a good idea or not. I like to believe I did my part in opening people's eyes that it IS a great idea, one that will bring a lot of value to BCH, and through this process we've gotten really close to the idea's final shape! That's how the Group CHIP got to v6.0 and is now titled "Unforgeable Groups", because it's all about enabling something more abstract, generic blockchain "primitives" that can let builders create amazing things, at no additional cost to our network, and allow users easy access to those products through easy "P2PKH" tokens, those that can interact with contracts and be moved around as easy and cheap as BCH!
-
[CHIP] Unforgeable Groups V6.0 Decentralized Applications on Bitcoin Cash
Hey man, thanks! I think we'll end up merging the 2 proposals, here's a first step in that direction: https://gitlab.com/0353F40E/group-tokenization/-/commit/bf37f2db09d0c2e0e0287d70d8741b1d495d2428
-
A Little Update on PMv3 and Group CHIPs
Unforgeable Groups CHIP scope
-
Introducing Unforgeable Groups for Bitcoin Cash - Using Groups as Owners
The latest "Group" proposal (v4.2) is more than just "tokenization". It got simpler and more powerful at the same time. It now enables generic BCH output groups that can be used to create persistent Script covenant contracts that can prove their genuineness. This is something that current contracts cannot do, even with the new Introspection opcodes. Group would make it possible because the groupID is a commitment to the whole genesis transaction, but this is not a post about that.
- BCHN Tech bulletin: Evaluate Viability of Transaction Format or ID Change
-
Coming soon to Pokket.cash: SmartBCH support!
Will you soon shut up about BCH being shit against "superior chains" when I point you to the CHIPs such as Native Introspection Opcodes, Bigger Script Integers which allows better smart contract functionality coming in 2022, and PMv3 and Group Tokens which allow better token and transaction formats that are coming in 2023?
-
We Want Native Tokens on BCH! CHIP-2021-02 v4.0 Unforgeable Groups
MAJOR UPDATE - 4.0 Unforgeable Groups for Bitcoin Cash
-
We Want First Class Tokens on BCH! CHIP-2021-02 Group Tokenization for Bitcoin Cash - Progress Report 2021-11-08
Here's the latest version of the CHIP: https://gitlab.com/0353F40E/group-tokenization/-/blob/6cc8488e145007f2c34b1a5e39368986430dcfdc/CHIP-2021-02_Group_Tokenization_for_Bitcoin_Cash.md
pmv3
Posts with mentions or reviews of pmv3.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-22.
- Compressed induction proofs
-
Coming soon to Pokket.cash: SmartBCH support!
Will you soon shut up about BCH being shit against "superior chains" when I point you to the CHIPs such as Native Introspection Opcodes, Bigger Script Integers which allows better smart contract functionality coming in 2022, and PMv3 and Group Tokens which allow better token and transaction formats that are coming in 2023?
-
What happened to "BSV is law-abiding blockchain and an honest system"?
BSV has no way of storing state or doing anything close to https://github.com/bitjson/pmv3. I'm curious as to what level of fuckery and bloat they're using this time.
- SLP Observation: User Experience
-
CHIP: Ranged Script Numbers (RSN) – a TX integer format which simplifies contracts, reduces transaction sizes, and enables future upgrades
For variable number ranges, all parsing can safely be accomplished using a single 11-byte macro, rather than the minimum 29-byte macro required of VarInt in most cases. (Note, the safe, fully-equivalent VarInt macro is 53-bytes.) This simplification is notable enough to enable use cases which would otherwise be inhibited by parsing constructions causing contracts to exceed VM limits.
-
Did I summarize the PMv3 transaction proposal correctly?
proposal: CHIP-2021-01-PMv3: Version 3 Transaction Format
-
[AMA] I'm Jason Dreyzehner, author of PMv3 – a v3 TX format enabling prediction markets and other decentralized applications on Bitcoin Cash. Ask Me Anything!
One nice thing about PMv3 is that the "solution space" is surprisingly limited. Initially it might seem like there are many ways to accomplish the two big goals of PMv3 ("fixed-size inductive proofs" and "VM integer compatibility"), but if you dig deep on any particular element, of the 2 of 3 possible solutions, there's a clear "best choice". (I've tried to document everything in the Rationale section of the spec.) There's probably only one design decision I'm less sure about (the RSN format), but only because the analysis to (dis)prove it is taking me a long time. 😅 (Working on some open source tooling.)
-
Where is BSV able to run Ethereum smart contracts? Does BSV have an AMM like Uni/Sushi? Does it have decentralized lending like Compound? Decentralized prediction markets like Augur? Does it have ERC20 tokens? What is an example of something BSV can do that ETH specializes in?
Out of curiosity, what would you think about https://github.com/bitjson/pmv3 as a way to enable Ethereum-like smart contracts using a local state contained inside?
-
Miner-validated tokens on BCH are coming. The powers-that-be will try to split the community on this issue. Do not fall for it!
There are many important use cases for which Group Tokens would require PMv3 (an upgrade which would enable Hashed Witnesses and make CashToken contracts possible in "userland").
-
Jihan Wu hints at an opportunity for BCH: "NFT requires low gas fee to work."
To enable hashed witnesses I proposed PMv3, a minimal v3 transaction format which enables a lot of other use cases like sidechained prediction markets (PM). Group Tokens also cannot support these use cases without hashed witnesses.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing group-tokenization and pmv3 you can also consider the following projects:
cashtokens - A proposal to enable two new primitives on Bitcoin Cash: fungible tokens and non-fungible tokens.
psf-slp-indexer - Indexer for validating SLP transactions. Uses LevelDB.
sdk - RUN JavaScript SDK
libauth - An ultra-lightweight, zero-dependency TypeScript library for Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin, and Bitauth applications.
research
cash-improvement-proposals
bitauth-ide - an online IDE for bitcoin (cash) contracts
slp-specifications - Simple Ledger Protocol (SLP) Specifications
bitauth-cli - universal identity and message authentication (WIP)
bch.info - Bitcoin Cash informational website
group-tokenization vs cashtokens
pmv3 vs cashtokens
group-tokenization vs psf-slp-indexer
pmv3 vs sdk
group-tokenization vs libauth
pmv3 vs research
group-tokenization vs cash-improvement-proposals
pmv3 vs bitauth-ide
group-tokenization vs slp-specifications
pmv3 vs bitauth-cli
group-tokenization vs bch.info
pmv3 vs libauth