grammars-v4
xonsh
grammars-v4 | xonsh | |
---|---|---|
29 | 112 | |
9,803 | 8,023 | |
0.8% | 1.1% | |
9.6 | 8.9 | |
2 days ago | about 6 hours ago | |
ANTLR | Python | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
grammars-v4
- Operadores de adição e subtração
-
Visual Basic for Applications Language Specification [pdf]
Perhaps the one from ANTLR's collection [0] is a good start (there are also others ANTLR VB6 grammars documented elsewhere). It does require knowing ANTLR, but that should be less effort for someone already familiar with language implementation, particularly, the visitor pattern (my favorite reference [1]).
[0] https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/vb6
[1] https://craftinginterpreters.com/representing-code.html
-
Postgres Language Server: Implementing the Parser
Where is the SQLite test suite, please? I'd be very interested.
There are already SQL grammars, check https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4 specifically in here I think https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/sql I contributed to one of them, and I wrote my own for some personal work. Be warned, it's very involved, very complex and MSSQL is rather ill-defined.
Names bracket identifiers) in SQL are bloody awful. Sometimes square brackets are even compulsory, and why you can usually replace [...] with the SQL standard "..." , not always! Trust me, it gets worse.
I don't find antlr grammars to be brittle, and while they can lose in performance (by how much I don't know, perhaps quite considerably) they are very easy to maintain and I am very fortunate to have antlr to work with.
-
Llama: Add Grammar-Based Sampling
This grammar "library" was cited as an example of what the format could look like:.
https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4
There is everything from assembly and C++ to glsl and scripting languages, arithmetic, games, and other weird formats.
-
Structured Output from LLMs (Without Reprompting!)
> Which brings me to the other approach: steering the LLM's output __as it is generating tokens__
A relevant PR:
https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/1773
The plan is to support arbitrary grammar files to constrain tokens as they are generated, like the ones here:
https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4
-
SQL-Parsing
Have a look at jooq - I know this has been used to rewrite SQL from one dialect to another, so it MUST be capable of collating code activity metrics. Look here. Otherwise, you might want to look into writing your own parser. ANTLR has a T-SQL dialect parser script here.
-
How should I prepare for AI-driven changes in the industry as a Software Engineering Manager
Find a Perl grammar file for ANTLR, like https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/perl Save the grammar file as Perl.g4 in your project. Now, you can create the Kotlin program: import org.antlr.v4.runtime.* import org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.ParseTree import java.io.File
- Can you create a cpp file in a program like you could a txt file?
-
DELD: An experimental HTTP-Client
Antlr is another option. You could generate a parser using the JSON antlr grammar.
- Are there any resources available to convert a code from Basic to C++? need to do this for the sake of an assignment. anything will be helpful
xonsh
-
This Week In Python
xonsh – Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell
- FLaNK Stack Weekly 19 Feb 2024
- Xonsh is a Python powered shell
-
Xonsh: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell
You need to downgrade ptk version. Look here - https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/issues/5241#issuecomment-1961...
-
Google ZX – A tool for writing better scripts
Friends, I'm not saying that tools like zx are not good. I do like to write some scripts using js/ts. I believe pythoners prefer https://xon.sh/ . Perl is also attractive and interesting. Fish is friendly.
However, I still believe that posix-shell has its own advantages. The balance among size, code length, and expressiveness. I think the only possible competitors are tcl and perl, maybe lua.
- Xonsh – A Python-Powered Shell
- Xonsh
-
Shh: Simple Shell Scripting from Haskell
Those of you who use (or used) this as your shell: care to share your experience?
It seems a lot less full-featured than https://xon.sh/, but maybe you don't need a lot of bells and whistles for regular usage. I mostly run build, execute, and install commands.
I'm somewhat enticed at the possibility of being able to wrap common executables into forms that are typed (like nushell or elvish) and manipulate them in a way that leverages the type checker.
-
Marcel the Shell
In that case, is it even more similar to xonsh?
https://xon.sh/
- Shshsh is a bridge connects Python and shell
What are some alternatives?
ANTLR - ANTLR (ANother Tool for Language Recognition) is a powerful parser generator for reading, processing, executing, or translating structured text or binary files.
nushell - A new type of shell
tree-sitter-sql - SQL grammar for tree-sitter
fish-shell - The user-friendly command line shell.
lezer-snowsql
ipython - Official repository for IPython itself. Other repos in the IPython organization contain things like the website, documentation builds, etc.
rewrite - Automated mass refactoring of source code.
oh-my-bash - A delightful community-driven framework for managing your bash configuration, and an auto-update tool so that makes it easy to keep up with the latest updates from the community.
tree-sitter-sql - SQL syntax highlighting for tree-sitter
PowerShell - PowerShell for every system!
go-mysql-server - A MySQL-compatible relational database with a storage agnostic query engine. Implemented in pure Go.
zx - A tool for writing better scripts