glide VS OkHttp

Do you mean what I use to show the images? I am using the Glide library, you can find more information here: https://github.com/bumptech/glide

as mentioned in the other post i don't have too much insight in the art loading because its using https://github.com/bumptech/glide for all image loading. Resolution is the only thing i know for sure can prevent an imagine from successfully loading, whether or not that resolution is fixed or if its dependent on the device I have not been able to determine

Ah, yes, downloading images as a files works completely differently from displaying images and it doesn't use any cache. Though in theory you could rewrite downloading logic to use the same mechanism as display (which is Glide)

Glide

You can also take a look at Coil, Picasso or Glide which usually have some kind of crossfade animation when the image loads.

GitHub: https://github.com/bumptech/glide

Image loading: Glide, Picasso, Coil, Fresco

Shortly said, they use React generally with fast-image and Glide for better loading of images Hermes JS Engine for app optimization. The app itself seems to generally use Kotlin and a few Java libraries and they also implemented Sqlite but I'm not sure about the use case for it probably they use it for progress though (The Developer/Marketer needs to confirm this), lastly they seem to use IntellJ Idea for programming and probably compiling

If you see a file like this: https://github.com/bumptech/glide/blob/master/library/src/main/java/com/bumptech/glide/RequestBuilder.java tell me that your eyes don't immediately go to the comments first instead of the code.

We will use Square’s Mock Webserver to spin up a mock server which we can use to simulate real api's request to the get coffee endpoint.

OkHttp Documentation

mockwebserver -> https://github.com/square/okhttp/tree/master/mockwebserver

I searched in the OkHttp GitHub project for an advice on which values may be suitable for Android apps nowadays but found no answers (only this old issue which does not help). Since we share a single OkHttp client Singleton for all our retrofit APIs and even Coil, I wonder if the default 5 maxRequestsPerHost is really enough.

You can technically add a Content-Length header for each part. It's not forbidden by the RFC, but nor is it common. It caused [problems](https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/2138) for OkHttp, and they eventually removed it. Might be fine for internal-only use, though.

Boundaries are a lot like UUIDs, and rely on the same logic. When generating random data, once you have enough bits, the odds are against that sequence of bits ever having been generated before in the universe.

Lets be specific. This is the gradle build file for Squares okhttp client library. How exactly would your bld tool "predict" or "help" with all the parameters needed? There is no need to be defensive. Replace those large build files with your own, show where your approach is better and then understanding will lead to better solutions.

And adding to that: The asynchttpclient library is just a thin wrapper around OkHttp3, so it might be easier to just go with that instead: https://square.github.io/okhttp/

Retrofit in combination with OkHttp for fetching data from server (which hopefully already exists)

OkHttp