typescript-book
proposal-type-annotations
typescript-book | proposal-type-annotations | |
---|---|---|
5 | 101 | |
8,253 | 4,100 | |
- | 0.7% | |
8.2 | 4.7 | |
24 days ago | about 2 months ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
typescript-book
-
Using Next without TypeScript?
https://github.com/gibbok/typescript-book - Free e-book to learn typescript
- The Concise TypeScript Book
-
TypeScript Book
One thing I’ve never found a name for (and, as a result, a good way to reference to people) is Typescript’s interesting behaviour around the Erased Structural Types mentioned here: https://github.com/gibbok/typescript-book#erased-structural-....
Objects passed to a function that accepts an object type can generally have more properties that needed given Typescript’s structural typing. That is unless you pass a literal directly to the function (I.e. inline the obj variable in the linked example). In which case Typescript will complain about the excess properties. Ergonomic but confusing the first time you come across it.
proposal-type-annotations
-
Bun 1.1
That proposal is not fully compatible with Typescript: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations?tab=readme...
-
Go 1.22 Release Notes
They held a meeting a few months ago so it's alive but probably still years away.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations/issues/184
-
[AskJS] Kicking a dead horse - TS vs JS
I particularly like this thread in the TC39 types proposal. TypeScript IS a development trojan horse and locks you into the Microsoft Way of being a JS developer.
- Strong static typing, a hill I'm willing to die on...
-
HTML First – Six principles for building simple, maintainable, web software
Edit: There is a proposal to extend JavaScript with type annotations, which would allow ("a reasonably large subset") of TypeScript to run directly in the browser. Yay!
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
More importantly, TypeScript typically commits to build things into itself when the proposal in JavaScript reaches Stage 3. The pattern matching proposal in JavaScript is Stage 1, but depends on many other proposals as well that may or may not need to be at Stage 3 as well for it to work. This particular proposal is interested on pattern matching on JavaScript Objects and other primitives, just like Python does with it’s native primitives. These are also dynamic types which helps in some areas, but makes it harder than others. Additionally, the JavaScript type annotations proposal needs to possibly account for this. So it’s going to be awhile. Like many years.
-
Show HN: Conway's Game of Life in TypeScript's type system
this is exactly what I want from the _Types as Comments_ proposal[0] as I think it's the only way that types can feasibly become part of the language. It's hard to imagine how all of the concepts TS introduces via special syntax can be covered otherwise.
[0] https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations
-
Why Htmx Does Not Have a Build Step
Crossing my fingers that the proposal for allowing (browser-ignored) type annotations in javascript progresses: https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations/
Between that, HTTP2/3 and ES modules many of the downsides for building apps with no compile step are almost completely mitigated.
-
TypeScript Without Transpilation
JSDoc can get you pretty far, but it can be clumsy sometimes. There’s a [TC39 proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations) to allow types to live in JS code and be treated as comments (similar with Python types today)
- Do you think typescript will ever have native support on brosers? Or we will have only the JS type annotations?
What are some alternatives?
GitNoter - Create, organise & explore notes with your git repository using GitNoter! GitNoter is a markdown based note taking webapp that provides a nice user interface to allow users to create, explore & organise notes with their github repository. [Moved to: https://github.com/git-noter/gitnoter]
astexplorer - A web tool to explore the ASTs generated by various parsers.
typescript-book - :books: The definitive guide to TypeScript and possibly the best TypeScript book :book:. Free and Open Source 🌹
Scala.js - Scala.js, the Scala to JavaScript compiler
materio-mui-react-nextjs-admin-template-free - Materio is the Most Powerful & Comprehensive free Next.js React admin template based on MUI !! 🚀
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
Cromwell - WordPress-like CMS for Next.js websites
Carp - A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.
d2-playground - An online runner to play, learn, and create with D2, the modern diagram scripting language that turns text to diagrams.
proposal-record-tuple - ECMAScript proposal for the Record and Tuple value types. | Stage 2: it will change!
deno - A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.
assemblyscript - A TypeScript-like language for WebAssembly.