zeit-ui-react
styletron
zeit-ui-react | styletron | |
---|---|---|
8 | 5 | |
4,210 | 3,321 | |
0.7% | 0.0% | |
1.8 | 6.5 | |
4 months ago | 4 months ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
zeit-ui-react
-
is the vercel website is open-source?
Not what you asked for, but take a look at https://geist-ui.dev. It's a component library that has been heavily influenced by Vercel. Poking around some of the Vercel dashboard code, it looks like they even use it.
- Vercel Design System
-
My Open Source Journey
After this humble begining I started contributing to libraries I was using in my projects some of which are geist-react, leerob's site, html-to-rescript, dogehouse and much more.
-
NextUI - Build beautiful React websites regardless of your design experience
Geist isn't Vercel either
-
5 React.js UI Component libraries.
Geist UI
- The button component used in next.js framework
styletron
-
A recruiter asked me this.
React is pretty much its own language at this point. With J/TSX. Not even CSS is immune to react's approach of "what everything was proprammatically generated divs?", case and point https://www.styletron.org
-
Tailwind CSS v3
Some technical thoughts as someone who could care less about fanboyism:
- One point where atomic CSS frameworks are supposed to shine over conventional CSS is bundle size, since they (at least the good ones) compile to only a single rule for any used value, rather than potentially repeating rules for semantically different classes.
- Another point where atomic CSS frameworks shine is just sheer volume of banging code out. When the bulk of your output is visual, mastering tools based on shorthands like tailwind, emmet, etc can feel very productive.
- Purely atomic CSS frameworks can make some workflows more difficult, e.g. by having too granular call sites and not allowing "let's see what happens to the overall theme if I do this design change" iterative style of work, or because workflows that edit CSS on the fly via browser devtools can no longer be used to limit impact within semantic lines (e.g. "I want to change padding only on buttons, without breaking everything else that happens to depend on the same padding value"). There are both design-oriented and debugging-oriented workflows that are affected in similar ways.
- You generally don't get visual regressions at a distance w/ atomic CSS. This matters at organizations where desire for pixel precision and simultaneously fickle design teams are the norm. But conversely, "can we just change the font size to be a bit bigger across the site" can often run into issues of missed spots. On a similar note, designs may become inconsistent across a site over time due to the hyper local nature of atomic CSS oriented development.
- Custom rules may as well be written in APL[0]; they usually aren't documented and it takes a "you-gotta-know-them-to-know-them" sort of familiarity to be able to work with them (or get back to them after a while).
- There are some tools that mix and match atomic CSS with other paradigms. For example, styletron[0] can output atomic CSS for the bundling benefits, but looks like React styled components from a devexp perspective, and has rendering modes that output traditional-looking debug classes for chrome devtool oriented workflows.
The main theme to be aware of: proponents rarely talk of maintenance, so beware of honeymoon effect. Detractors often omit that traditional CSS (especially at scale) also requires a lot of diligence to maintain. So think about maintenance and how AOP[1] vs hyperlocal development workflows interact with your organization's design culture.
[0] https://www.styletron.org/
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-oriented_programming
-
5 React.js UI Component libraries.
It is created, managed, and utilized by Uber. It includes a wide range of attractive components, with accessibility as the top focus. It is quick since it is built with the Styletron engine. Style overrides can be used to tweak themes, but in my experience, I've never required them because the design vibe they're trying for is precisely what I want.
-
Just-In-Time: The Next Generation of Tailwind CSS
[0] https://www.styletron.org/ [1] https://baseweb.design/blog/getting-started-with-styletron#getting-started-with-styletron
-
@blocz/react-responsive v3 is out
When we created the library, we were using styletron for our styles, and we wanted to bind the breakpoints we defined in @blocz/react-responsive with the breakpoints used for our styles.
What are some alternatives?
chakra-ui - ⚡️ Simple, Modular & Accessible UI Components for your React Applications
styled-components - Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅
antd - An enterprise-class UI design language and React UI library
emotion - 👩🎤 CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition
searchkit - Search UI for Elasticsearch & Opensearch. Compatible with Algolia's Instantsearch and Autocomplete components. React & Vue support
Fela - State-Driven Styling in JavaScript
@artsy/fresnel - An SSR compatible approach to CSS media query based responsive layouts for React.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
reakit - Toolkit for building accessible web apps with React
linaria - Zero-runtime CSS in JS library
JSS - JSS is an authoring tool for CSS which uses JavaScript as a host language.