fusionauth-site VS quickadd

Have tried to use this a few times but it's a big lift. Like adding unit tests to an existing application, it's a good idea to start small. And vale doesn't make this super easy (at least I couldn't figure out an easy way to do this). If I could wave my wand, I'd want a way to:

* apply vale to just the doc I was working on

* have a minimal set of rules

* add to them over time

At $curjob, we have a detailed public list of rules of doc ( https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-site/blob/master/Do... ) and as our team expands, I'd love to have them be applied rigorously. vale seems like a good fit, but there's an activation energy that I haven't been able to get over yet.

I am not aware of any other cli tools similar to this, though, so totally admire the team behind it.

Thanks for the comments! Will try to address them in the near future, tracking here: https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-site/issues/2170

I actually have much more experience with plantuml (we actually have a plugin which generates diagrams for our jekyll/asciidoc docs site: https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-site/blob/master/si... ), but I have recently started using mermaid for a project and like it so far.

I had a colleague (thanks Sanjay!) make a similar tool at a hackfest (you can see the source code here: https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-site/blob/master/sr... ).

I've modified it a bit to take a URL, but haven't yet set it up to read a config file to make a large number of screenshots easy to do.

We do outline certain fields or other areas in the doc to highlight a point. That's caused some hesitation on my part. However, it looks like I could use imagemagick to automatically put a red box or similar on an image (with a `-draw` command).

We have a ton of screenshots (600+) throughout our doco, and a way to initialize our product to a known state, so the pieces are all there.

One of these days it'll be worthwhile to do this.

by Adam Pavlisin & Slavo Glinsky ➤➤➤ https://acreom.com

there's a much better way providing simplicity with full data ownership and real tasks out of the box in daily documents https://acreom.com

the premise of this article is false. acreom [1] is VC backed, and doesn’t implement any of the mentioned practices. No price subsidising (quite the opposite), no pressure to create lock-in or monetize user data etc. There’s nothing wrong with being VC backed given the expectations between investors, the team and users are aligned.

[1] https://acreom.com/

Check out https://acreom.com, you literally own the software, it's local-first, E2EE, integrated, runs on markdown files, and once you download the app you can keep it forever.

Hello HN! Maker of Keycheck.dev here.

Keycheck is an open-source web app that lets you quickly find consistent and conflict-free shortcuts for your app. Currently featuring over 100 apps, and 1400 shortcuts.

When designing keyboard shortcuts for our main app - acreom (https://acreom.com/), we wanted to create a great keyboard user experience. This involves designing shortcuts which are easy to hit, easy to remember, and do not clash with the system shortcuts. We have learned that there’s no reason to reinvent the wheel and it’s easier to follow conventions from other popular apps to achieve this. Finding this out, however, was frustrating, and involved lots of manual work of downloading and signing in to other apps.

We decided to solve this problem and open-source our solution to help other makers in the process of designing shortcuts. You can match any key combination against combinations of other apps, search shortcuts by their keybinds, descriptions, or by app, and explore the apps and see their shortcuts. Feel free to play around and explore all the possibilities.

The code is fully open-sourced (https://github.com/Acreom/keycheck) and contributions are welcome! If you are a maker, feel free add your app to help other makers and increase visibility for your own project.

Looking forward to the feedback!

with the steep learning curve of setting it up followed by the never ending UX complexities emacs seems like it's for people who get satisfaction of spending time setting things up rather than being effective. A modern alternative of this is Notion.

On the contrary, for people who care about getting stuff done with a capture-first organize-later interface that works out of the box like an iPhone, options are limited.

for the curious ones I'm building one myself https://acreom.com

- acreom (https://acreom.com)

acreom | DevRel (remote) or Prague (Czechia)

https://acreom.com is a markdown knowledge base with tasks for developers. We're building a delightful and integrated interface developers love using alongside their code editors to organise their work.

reach out to me directly /martin at acreom dot com/ for more info.