funsat VS build

Compare funsat vs build and see what are their differences.

funsat

An efficient, embeddable DPLL SAT solver in Haskell (by dbueno)

build

Build Systems à la Carte (by snowleopard)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
funsat build
- 1
35 230
- -
0.0 2.8
almost 9 years ago about 2 months ago
Groff TeX
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

funsat

Posts with mentions or reviews of funsat. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning funsat yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

build

Posts with mentions or reviews of build. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Build systems à la carte (2018)
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Apr 2023
    Code is available at https://github.com/snowleopard/build

    I skimmed the paper - this is interesting on many aspects but I liked the breadth of what they analyzed... they use Excel as one of the examples!

    I know it is a valuable skill to be able to efficiently break down problems into abstractions but I suspect you would still end up with "porcelain"[0] that would hide so much of this it might not be worth it. Or maybe it is so generic it becomes a standard of sorts (or certainly a standard way of doing things) with flavors of implementations on top of it?

    In the conclusion they say:

    > ... a simple recombination leads to a design for a monadic suspending cloud build system ...

    Totally over my head as I still don't grok monads despite my belief I use them or something very close to them all the time without realizing it. I could not implement one. Anyway, I digress... neat paper and I will keep working on digesting it.

    [0] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Plumbing-and-Po...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing funsat and build you can also consider the following projects:

incremental-sat-solver - Simple, Incremental SAT Solving as a Haskell Library

spacefill - Space-filling curves

graph-generators - A Haskell library for creating random Data.Graph instances using several pop

text-metrics - Calculate various string metrics efficiently in Haskell

twentyseven - Rubik's cube solver in Haskell

cmaes - CMA-ES wrapper in Haskell

Ritt-Wu

nonlinear-optimization-ad - Several Haskell packages for numerical optimizations.

binary-search - Binary and exponential searches

GraphSCC - Tarjan's algorithm for computing strongly connected components

learning-hmm - Yet another Haskell library for hidden Markov models