fullstack-starterkit VS dogehouse

I'm learning fullstack JavaScript development, and was trying to get ideas for project organization going forward. I've already started putting the frontend/backend in separate subdirectories in monorepos to allow them to be developed independently, and it seems to be working well. However, this repo (https://github.com/karanpratapsingh/fullstack-starterkit) separates the two, but includes a third package.json in the root directory. What's the point of this? I've had experiences where package versions clash due to differences between package.json files in parent and child directories, is there a way to make sure this is avoided if I copy this organization?

Github: https://github.com/karanpratapsingh/fullstack-starterkit/tree/master/backend-go

Backend is now available in Go! 🥳

Hi, An opensource graphql first boilerplate https://github.com/karanpratapsingh/fullstack-starterkit might help

Full changelog Github

I usually set it up at root level, example that might help: https://github.com/karanpratapsingh/fullstack-starterkit

Full changelog/PR is available here

Full changelog/PR is available here

After this humble begining I started contributing to libraries I was using in my projects some of which are geist-react, leerob's site, html-to-rescript, dogehouse and much more.

Dogehouse by Ben Awad: https://github.com/benawad/dogehouse

I think more and more React devs will prefer functional-type languages. Ex: Ben Awad, a YouTuber known for React, wrote the backend for his open-source start-up in Elixir (Link to repo).

https://github.com/benawad/dogehouse Let’s try making a good federated ID service for it

This is the issue on gh -> https://github.com/benawad/dogehouse/issues/2100

Have you heard of clubhouse? or better yet, dogehouse.tv?