onedark.nvim VS NvChad

ful1e5/onedark.nvim is completely written in Lua which means it loads way faster. It also supports Treesitter which provides way better syntax highlighting, which dick/onedark.vim doesn't. Lastly, my favourite feature is that it allows you to override/create highlight group configs and pass to the plugin before loading the colorscheme which makes customizing highlight groups super easy (and I would guess faster as well?) compared to calling highlight a bunch of times in your config. Here's What my configuration of it looks like if you're curious.

I use ful1e5/onedark.nvim which is written in Lua and has support for a tonne of Neovim plugins including Treesitter

My favorite is Onedark. There are many implementations but ful1e5/onedark.nvim looks the best imo and is easy to customize and has support for many plugins including treesitter. It's written in Lua.

I'm using https://github.com/ful1e5/onedark.nvim couple of months now and I quite like it. Very pleasing to the eyes. I'm also very found of the utilities in it that are analogous to the tokyonight colorscheme. Best thing to come out of atom imo.

Onedark. I've tried various versions and I like ful1e5/onedark.nvim the best.

Link: https://github.com/ful1e5/onedark.nvim

Can you able to elaborate and attach some screenshots here? I'm really excited to dive in. If I fix this issue, I will create a PR on your repo.

- config - colors

NvChad

This repo https://github.com/siduck76/NvChad ?

https://github.com/siduck76/NvChad . Its meant to be used as a base config , isnt a framework like spacevim etc.

repo

Seems like lots of people have their own lua folder under ~/.config/nvim that init.vim or init.lua gets info from. One example of this structure is here

But to be honest, configuring vim to your taste also takes a lot of time (but on the other side, you could use preconfigured nvim nightly which does a lot for you).